Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 138 total)
How about specifying EOFCRLF as the row terminator when you BCP in? Then it shouldn't bring the EOF into the field.
-Dan
-Dan
November 14, 2002 at 4:12 pm
Antares is right...you must call it like this:
select * from OPENQUERY(TSTCMDDB1,'select * from master.dbo.usysprocess(51)')
-Dan
-Dan
November 14, 2002 at 4:05 pm
One trick you may be able to use if the flat file is fixed width or comma/tab delimited is to create 1 large column in a work table, named "text1"...
-Dan
November 13, 2002 at 4:35 pm
Ah, the never-ending debate...I worked on Sybase/UNIX platform for 5 years and now I work with SQL Server, and I can say without a doubt that MS SQL Server 2000...
-Dan
November 13, 2002 at 9:06 am
You could use an insert trigger to put a record into a control table that holds those needing the backorder process run on them. Then a SQL server job...
-Dan
November 11, 2002 at 2:24 pm
Try:
SELECT [contact-date], FROM custlog
WHERE Convert(varchar,[contact-date],101) like '07/01/2002%'
OR
-- This will use the index, if there is one...
SELECT [contact-date], FROM custlog
where [contact-date] > Convert(smalldatetime,'07/01/2002')
and [contact-date] <=...
-Dan
November 11, 2002 at 2:18 pm
I think this is a bug with Microsoft. You may have to convert it to a char and pad it with spaces or zeros.
-Dan
-Dan
November 7, 2002 at 10:47 am
Try This:
IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM sysobjects WHERE [Name] = 'TAB1' AND Type = 'U')
BEGIN
CREATE TABLE TAB1 ...
END
-Dan
-Dan
November 7, 2002 at 10:25 am
Thanks, that's exactly what I needed!
-Dan
-Dan
November 7, 2002 at 9:40 am
Dynamic SQL is slower due to the fact that the execution plans cannot be re-used. Even with sp_executesql, the execution plan can be re-used if the query stays the...
-Dan
November 6, 2002 at 3:43 pm
Typically data can be returned in the order of the clustered index without the use of ORDER BY, but there are some exceptions:
1) If the optimizer determines that the cost...
-Dan
November 6, 2002 at 3:19 pm
Keep in mind that doing a SELECT inside a transaction still does not put an exclusive lock on that row. You must do something that involves a logged operation...
-Dan
November 6, 2002 at 2:55 pm
I find that this does suppress the count messages:
set nocount on
exec master..xp_cmdshell 'dir *.txt'
How are you calling the extended proc? By the way, I'm on SQL 2000.
-Dan
-Dan
November 6, 2002 at 8:56 am
The field that is being updated needs to be checked in the WHERE clause. For example, if you are updating the InUse field, then it must say in the...
-Dan
November 6, 2002 at 8:45 am
Thanks, I'll give it a shot!
-Dan
-Dan
November 5, 2002 at 3:53 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 138 total)