Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 74 total)
Thanks. I actually found it in our MDW report when drilling down on Locks.
January 10, 2013 at 9:25 am
Thank you.
November 9, 2012 at 10:50 am
Yes, that is one of the options I will test in our mock environment. Also going to test adding new columns, running a crawler to update the new columns...
November 8, 2012 at 10:07 am
Thanks. That may be one of the cases but it doesn't count for the high % of NULL Query_Plans.
June 8, 2012 at 1:34 pm
The fix was to basically Add back the Article and than drop it again and it cleared the flag that was on the table.
May 9, 2012 at 1:45 pm
The table was removed from Replication and it won't be added back. I am still not sure why the flag was not changed.
May 9, 2012 at 8:37 am
Thanks, I will review from the link.
March 23, 2012 at 2:56 pm
Thank you for your reply. On one of the identified poor performing procs, With Recompile' was add to see if proc performance would improve. It still returned slowly....
March 9, 2012 at 2:33 pm
I think I am going to use the File Watcher component. Thanks.
June 2, 2009 at 2:43 pm
Also, you still would need to set up trustworthiness if you use sys.dm_exec_sessions instead of sysprocesses.
But will use this instead of sysprocesses.
September 5, 2007 at 8:57 am
Thanks for your help. I did have to add one additional step.
1. ALTER AUTHORIZATION ON DATABASE::dbname...
September 4, 2007 at 4:50 pm
Thanks.
June 7, 2007 at 12:30 pm
Here is what it looks like if I modify a test proc in SQL Server Management Studio I just created for this example:
As you can see it automatically throws in a an...
May 9, 2007 at 10:46 am
I checked that already. I don't have it set at the connection level, database level, or server level.
Any ideas.
thanks,
Daniel
May 9, 2007 at 10:36 am
Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 74 total)