Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 115 total)
Hmmm.... ok 99% there.
Some bright spark has added in something like this into the codes.
C01 (Red)
So the code picks up the red, but also picks up yellow from the end...
February 1, 2012 at 9:45 am
Paul,
Sorry for the late response.
That - is brilliant. Genious thinking. Thank you ever so much. I never thought of it quite like that.
I am not 100% sure...
February 1, 2012 at 4:50 am
However the question was still wrong as you still dont reference another column. You reference a UDF.
SQL Kiwi (1/31/2012)
Hugo Kornelis (1/31/2012)
February 1, 2012 at 1:12 am
Nakul Vachhrajani (1/31/2012)
3. A hint overrides a SET option
4. A database option overrides an instance option and a...
February 1, 2012 at 1:08 am
I must admit i dont like the questions which contain trickery.
However on the flip side - its interesting to see how people have got round these limitations. ...
January 31, 2012 at 2:07 am
Ok - for the read uncommited (my first issue) i was planning on the stored procs that read the data for the reports to set it in there.
Dan
January 30, 2012 at 9:14 am
Ashish,
Sorry for which of my two scenarios are you sugguesting using nolock?
Thanks for your help
Dan
January 30, 2012 at 4:45 am
Thanks for all suggestions.
Unfortunately no i cant change front end. Only thing i have a chance to do is change what people type in - and you know how...
January 6, 2012 at 9:41 am
Hi,
If you read the data of a table that you have made changes to - you will see the changes even if they have not been committed.
To highlight this i...
December 19, 2011 at 6:55 am
paul.knibbs (12/16/2011)
danielfountain (12/16/2011)
If rebuilding the indexes can cause the file to grow - why not rebuild the indexes then shrinkfile afterwards?
Because doing a shrink will fragment the indexes again, thus...
December 16, 2011 at 2:10 am
Good article - quick question though.
If rebuilding the indexes can cause the file to grow - why not rebuild the indexes then shrinkfile afterwards?
Dan
December 16, 2011 at 2:00 am
If anyone is interested - the only way i could get rid of them was via the code.
Unless anyone has a better way? odd.
TIA
Dan
December 14, 2011 at 4:05 am
The plot thickens.
If i do this
CONVERT(DATETIME, PAD.AdditionalDetail1)
or this
CONVERT(DATETIME, PAD.AdditionalDetail1,0)
The problem goes away. However if i do this
CONVERT(DATETIME, PAD.AdditionalDetail1,101)
or
CONVERT(DATETIME, PAD.AdditionalDetail1,100)
It still errors.
The field has dates that ares...
November 11, 2011 at 9:59 am
Doh Sorry i worked it out. I didnt need the partition.
November 10, 2011 at 3:41 am
Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 115 total)