Viewing 15 posts - 766 through 780 (of 2,640 total)
sorry but 300Gb is not a large database. I seem to recollect that the definition of a large database is when you can't back it up within a 24 hour...
January 1, 2008 at 10:32 am
I like the fact you show it's a code issue not a sql issue. I'm constantly asked to index queries to improve them when the reality is that often the...
January 1, 2008 at 10:22 am
it's nothing to worry about
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Administering/fragmentation101/1346/
December 31, 2007 at 10:59 am
I got someone to write me an excel spreadsheet which I just entered the figures and it worked it out for me!
In most cases database growth is pure guesswork unless...
December 31, 2007 at 10:55 am
what you are in effect providing is the ability to write total ad-hoc queries against a table, these types of queries are almost impossible to tune ( with efficient...
December 31, 2007 at 10:52 am
make the proc name a filter in text
December 31, 2007 at 10:48 am
sadly navision, a product from microsoft, uses almost exculsively client side cursors executing ad-hoc and dynamic sql. So if you're trying to tune this ERP system expect to see lots...
December 31, 2007 at 10:47 am
always be wary of removing nvarchar/nchar just in case they were actually put there for a reason, likewise reducing column widths should be done with great care with regard to...
December 31, 2007 at 10:05 am
you should not name user stored procedures sp_
I'd suggest a T-SQL training course which will help you to understand set based ops.
December 31, 2007 at 10:01 am
you may be able to view waits, sometimes these shows as sos_schedulers, if I remember correctly.
What I will say is that this state of affairs should not happen so there...
December 31, 2007 at 9:57 am
it's very important that when you create objects you don't include collate statements unless there is a precise reason to do so, that way your objects pick up the database...
December 31, 2007 at 9:52 am
I have to admit I've never tried installing BOL without management studio. Just get the latest net framework 2.x and I assume it should work.
December 31, 2007 at 9:47 am
no worries - I find myself often trying to explain why a fill factor of 80% is such a waste of space on etl import tables, or even read only...
December 29, 2007 at 8:09 am
you all seem to be using old 2000 tables instead of the 2005 dmvs !
as to original post, logic should dictate that the size of the stored data will not...
December 28, 2007 at 1:03 pm
no sorry, as I say, I don't use maint plans.
December 28, 2007 at 5:27 am
Viewing 15 posts - 766 through 780 (of 2,640 total)