Viewing 15 posts - 2,191 through 2,205 (of 2,640 total)
the log will truncate at a checkpoint, sql server will decide when best to do that , or not, try issuing an explicit checkpoint.
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
April 25, 2006 at 10:09 am
ntfs fragmentation is not good, especially for data files, log files by their nature may tend to fragment.
W2003 will allow an online defrag but you wouldn't want your users connected....
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
April 25, 2006 at 10:08 am
revoking public rights is quite a good move but there are some issues - you obviously move away from an "out of the box" install - this means if things...
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
April 25, 2006 at 10:04 am
think it's something to do with small tables that fit in a page or two. I spent ages trying to get one to improve from 50% and decided it was...
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
April 25, 2006 at 5:21 am
I'm sorry but it's difficult to say for sure, I don't really have any experience of access - but 11 years sql server says it doesn't sound right! Perhaps another...
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
April 24, 2006 at 3:37 pm
I know what code is running, I was interested in what was happening in tempdb with regard to workfiles and such - it's just I couldn't find any refs to...
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
April 24, 2006 at 3:35 pm
There are a number of ways you can handle this - there are some whitepapers about this - you might like to check out http://www.sqlsecurity.com/
My preference would be to...
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
April 24, 2006 at 10:46 am
or you could upgrade to 2005 which has ddl triggers.
seriously though I agree with Clive - restrict your users who can issue this command.
You can capture this event with profiler,...
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
April 24, 2006 at 10:39 am
I'd seriously disagree about the speed increase ( in real measurable terms ) I'd say you'd struggle without a DC.
notwithstanding the debate about security of the connection method I'd say...
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
April 24, 2006 at 10:25 am
tricky to be sure - you might want to make sure you're not short of disk space or suffering from ntfs fragmentation in the snapshot/transaction folder. You might want to...
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
April 24, 2006 at 10:21 am
how will you schedule your osql job?
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
April 24, 2006 at 10:16 am
I don't really understand why you would see heavy use of sp_helpuser and I don't know why it should block, if at all. You don't say how you're getting your...
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
April 24, 2006 at 10:13 am
that'll be it then! Transactions are best made as small and as quick as possible
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
April 21, 2006 at 11:09 am
to be honest there's little point as anyone can download a proc to decrypt them. .. but -- script them all out and do a find and replace on the...
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
April 21, 2006 at 8:52 am
well any explicit transaction will block for the duration of the transaction - is the proc blocking itself or other sql?
I note that your proc doesn't include any rollback in...
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
April 21, 2006 at 8:49 am
Viewing 15 posts - 2,191 through 2,205 (of 2,640 total)