Viewing 15 posts - 1,951 through 1,965 (of 2,640 total)
http://download.microsoft.com/download/5/E/7/5E7B79D4-90B8-4A3D-B964-8A72F49A21A9/caleula.pdf
seems to indicate you can upgrade your cals but I don't know what version of 2005 you would buy.
July 28, 2006 at 10:14 am
the standard pager goes through an extended proc so I doubt you could do much - I don't know if you could create your own proc to handle the pager...
July 28, 2006 at 10:05 am
the create date of tempdb will tell from when your server has been running, subtract from today for runing time.
July 28, 2006 at 9:57 am
The solution is dictated by the amount of data you can lose .. what data exactly are you planning to store and how much can you lose?
There's little point covering...
July 28, 2006 at 9:54 am
Oh one other point, you can't run profiler for tuning against encrypted procs effectively or use showplan with QA effectively.
July 28, 2006 at 9:41 am
sorry I don't have an answer regarding oracle - an rpc call is where you return the result set as a procedure call - e.g.
insert into mytable
exec remoteserver remoteproc
now do...
July 28, 2006 at 9:32 am
so many questions - so many answers !!!
table variables are good for small data sets but rubbish for large data sets. If the populated set is of any size always...
July 28, 2006 at 9:17 am
well the usual list to start:-
Is the harware the same, are the indexes the same. Have you updated stats? Have you compared the query plans to spot the differences.
Is the...
July 28, 2006 at 8:33 am
Well written article and an interesting read, I still don't see what advantage I might gain from it however, and as far as users are concerned the last thing I'd...
July 28, 2006 at 8:27 am
Hmm I must have been lucky to never encounter this, mind 818 patch is very elderly now so I wouldn't be running a box without this.
btw. I doubt we're helping...
July 28, 2006 at 3:40 am
No you have to turn on awe, check in BOL , and set the max and min memory required. This assumes you haven't removed the /PAE switch from w2003 and...
July 28, 2006 at 3:36 am
aarghhh ! Sorry Bill but very bad idea, a leading % will force a table scan for each sarg .. very expensive.
so i/o counts .. I figure about 1.5k for...
July 27, 2006 at 2:48 pm
In some ways some of these forum posts would work better face to face !! still - I've tended to work where common groups of service accounts exist within a...
July 27, 2006 at 2:34 pm
check the query plans for the proc and qa query to see if they are different.
I've encountered this type of problem and the solutions can be a bit strange!! so...
July 27, 2006 at 10:25 am
I'm slightly intrigued by your description as to the 2gb you see the service using. In normal operation sql server is limited to around 1.6Gb maybe just under 1.7Gb and...
July 27, 2006 at 10:21 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1,951 through 1,965 (of 2,640 total)