Viewing 15 posts - 7,231 through 7,245 (of 7,498 total)
Windows version ?
SQLServer version ?
AWE enabled ?
(check
- http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;319477&Product=sql2k
- http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;323212&Product=sql2k
January 20, 2004 at 12:09 am
Jonathan
SQL7 -> no cascading deletes through DRI. That must be done using triggers.
Dan,
The DRI-checking will be done by sqlserver, so provide FK-indexes to support it.
If those indexes hurt performance to...
January 19, 2004 at 7:26 am
My guess,
you have a table with nullable columns that you use with a unique index.
A primary key constraint cannot be defined on nullable columns.
With a unique index, you can...
January 19, 2004 at 4:57 am
should be single quotes ..
SELECT @TestSql = 'INSERT INTO @TestTable SELECT au_id,au_fname From [pubs].[dbo].[authors] '
EXECUTE (@TestSql)
January 19, 2004 at 2:31 am
Is this what you're looking for ?
select J.Name as JobName, RP.program_name
from msdb..sysjobs J with (nolock)
inner join master..sysprocesses RP with (nolock)
on RP.program_name like 'SQLAgent - TSQL JobStep (Job '...
January 16, 2004 at 8:33 am
I hope your day today will be mutch better ![]()
Regarding the hyperlink : Believe me, once you seen Sheryl explain the whole stuff, you'll...
January 15, 2004 at 2:30 am
No, this only means that a litle testing is advisable for anyone who wants to build some knowlage of an rdbms. It's not because any solution works "optimal" for me,...
January 15, 2004 at 12:04 am
I thought the smilies would give enough indication that that reply was only ment to be a litle dry humor. After all there was no sql-technical info involved
January 14, 2004 at 11:52 pm
As always, you'll have to compare execution plans and runtimes to build your choice on. Hey, this may even by the occasion for a 'aha-erlebnis'
January 14, 2004 at 6:20 am
Hey, I thought the were bits and pieces of bricks and cement with your last reply![]()
As far as I'm concerned you may as well...
January 14, 2004 at 4:48 am
Perform it on both, maybe that gets it all into the daylight, but at least perform it where you are having the problem (i.e. the select).
- QA\Query\display estimated execution plan...
January 13, 2004 at 7:04 am
read my previous reply![]()
Activate the "show (estimated) execution plan" in QueryAnalyser, maybe that will clarify the issue.
January 13, 2004 at 6:37 am
Do you have an index on column Code ?
If not it will have to perform a table-scan and therefor it will not be able to read through the uncommitted row(s).
January 13, 2004 at 6:20 am
If the relation between the temp-tb and the tb is 1-1 and you're checking existance on the unique key, supporting it with a clustered index might speed up this join-operation.
With...
January 13, 2004 at 1:20 am
And that are just the adjustments you need to rename the tables.
(You coud script your db and perform the rename textwize and recreate it...
you could also use tools like CA-ERwin,...
January 13, 2004 at 12:31 am
Viewing 15 posts - 7,231 through 7,245 (of 7,498 total)