Viewing 15 posts - 4,036 through 4,050 (of 7,496 total)
HanShi (2/11/2009)
February 11, 2009 at 5:04 am
If you were on CU10 or 11 of SP2, I'd suggest you go on to CU1 of SP3 to get to the same software level.
February 10, 2009 at 11:45 pm
It's always nice if some one makes life easy for you. 😎
As always, adding default values for columns is something that depends on the needs of your data model !
If...
February 10, 2009 at 2:09 pm
As Chad stated, there is a CU1 for SP3 (released at about the same time as sp3 itself).
To apply it to a SP2+CU10 (or CU11), you can directly apply SP3...
February 10, 2009 at 12:52 pm
You just need to start it. No configuration needed.
Just be sure you use Local System service account !
(just as a best practise. In clustered env. you need it to be...
February 10, 2009 at 12:33 am
We run AV on all our servers.
For db servers we exclude the db file locatons as well as the location of the backup files.
We recently had an issue with one...
February 9, 2009 at 2:23 pm
You need to start SQLBrowser service for your applications to be able to find and use the instance.
(unless you connect directly using the actual port number)
February 9, 2009 at 2:18 pm
Although Greg's solution works, you should still pose the question if you need to do this in a query!
Presentation should be handled at the front end application !
(one of the...
February 9, 2009 at 2:14 pm
Did you try :
declare @begin datetime, @end datetime;
set @begin = getdate() - 1 -- dateadd(hh,-1,getdate())
set...
February 9, 2009 at 10:21 am
synce you run the sproc in parallel
and you create objects,
I'm not surprised you run into conflicts.
At least at catalog level (creating the objects, indexes,..).
February 9, 2009 at 10:17 am
gharris_35 (2/9/2009)
February 9, 2009 at 10:14 am
ehm .... Microsoft SQL Server 2005 - 9.00.1399.06 ... thats RTM ! (+- 3 years without maintenance ??)
There are a number of fixes available and solved with SP3 (=current)...
February 9, 2009 at 12:35 am
hmm ... well normalized schema :sick:
Looks like someone migrated from access or so...
Let's see what we can do ... I'll be back 😀
February 9, 2009 at 12:21 am
RBarryYoung (2/8/2009)
All it does is to insure that at least one non-key column is not null.
.. to ensure the left join has a match....
i.e. only handle inner join stuff ...
Still...
February 9, 2009 at 12:17 am
Is there any credential mapping ?
Local system does not have auth on other servers !
February 9, 2009 at 12:08 am
Viewing 15 posts - 4,036 through 4,050 (of 7,496 total)