Viewing 15 posts - 3,481 through 3,495 (of 7,496 total)
Within the same major version of sqlserver a restore should never be an issue for user databases.
September 11, 2009 at 12:02 am
I'm glad it got sorted out, even with the misterious "for internal use" 😉
For best it should at least be added as a sidenote to the online rebuild in BOL.
Thanks...
September 10, 2009 at 11:51 pm
I'll put in a virtual pint :w00t:
Let's hope for the code mismatch, even if in both sql2005 as wel as 2008.
I'll vote on Connect !
Problem is, we cannot trace/dump the...
September 9, 2009 at 11:28 am
You should compare the execution plans for the troublesome queries.
(you can save them and post them is this forum thread if you want to)
Your issue must have something to do...
September 8, 2009 at 8:15 am
Breathe 😀
Out with the bad air ... In with the good ....
go
September 8, 2009 at 7:14 am
I would guess it has something to do with the basic difference of an online rebuild compared to an offline rebuild: keeping it up to date with ongoing operations.
So it...
September 8, 2009 at 6:52 am
- on the other hand, if the trigger fails, the whole transaction fails, so the insert will be undone !
- double check that the triggers are enabled !
SELECT OBJECT_NAME(parent_obj)...
September 6, 2009 at 11:52 pm
start sqlprofiler and ask your .net dev to perform his (her) inserts.
Check the statements your profiler shows and you'll have your diagnose.
September 6, 2009 at 10:56 am
Try a DAC (dedicated administrative connection) !
That should always allow a single sysadmins connection to perform some very basic stuff.
Keep in mind remote DAC is off by default, so you...
September 4, 2009 at 2:38 pm
Where are the days, when removing builtin\administrators was enough to be considered "secure". :w00t::hehe:
September 4, 2009 at 2:35 pm
dos prompt help for shutdown shows this:
X:\>shutdown /?
Usage: shutdown [-i | -l | -s | -r | -a] [-f] [-m \\computername] [-t xx] [-c "comment"] [-d up:xx:yy]
...
September 4, 2009 at 7:07 am
- What version of sql2005 is this ? (+ sp + cu please)
- has the package been modified lately ?
- did you try sp_revoke_login_from_proxy and grant it again ?
September 3, 2009 at 1:50 pm
Good input Bob.
We to often forget this new feature of sp2.
September 3, 2009 at 1:48 pm
:blink: :blink: Where's my donckey 😀
I've been reading a bit on the cloud topic ..... already forgot the obvious :blush:
At my plant, we only have CI databases.
I have...
September 2, 2009 at 8:01 am
Viewing 15 posts - 3,481 through 3,495 (of 7,496 total)