Viewing 12 posts - 31 through 43 (of 43 total)
I've always felt that the only way to truly assure security is to have the network cable unplugged and the computer in a lockable room.
The trade-off, however, is no good. The...
But boss, why must the urgent always take precedence over the important?
November 7, 2006 at 8:54 am
When I need proactive information (info I want before I need it), there's always the daily SQL Server Central e-mail.
When I need reactive information (got a problem, need a fix...
But boss, why must the urgent always take precedence over the important?
March 10, 2006 at 7:30 am
The securist computer is one not connected to a network and behind a locked door.
But boss, why must the urgent always take precedence over the important?
January 26, 2006 at 7:32 am
A friend just bought a PowerPC based dual-proc Mac and got me to thinking...
An article on how Apple's the only computer maker to care about the end user, Windows is...
But boss, why must the urgent always take precedence over the important?
January 19, 2006 at 8:17 am
I'm not going to talk about the kid's grades other than to say I agree with Mark Yelton about the pay period notion.
I'm more interested in the next to last...
But boss, why must the urgent always take precedence over the important?
January 11, 2006 at 8:21 am
I've had some difficulty with this myself, but it's not too hard to accomplish. My situation involves something similar - I have one stored proc which returns different shaped record...
But boss, why must the urgent always take precedence over the important?
December 15, 2005 at 11:55 am
Number of records is not the most significant measure of index performance - it is selectivity of data. If your attribute table contains only a few different attribute types, while...
But boss, why must the urgent always take precedence over the important?
December 2, 2005 at 7:47 am
10 More Influential (but not always in a positive way!)
Martin Luther King
Franklin D. Roosevelt
Albert Einstein
Adolf Hitler
Winston Churchill
Ronald Reagan
Mikhail Gorbachev
Robert Oppenheimer
Orville & Wilbur Wright (I know, technically two in one slot...)
Henry...
But boss, why must the urgent always take precedence over the important?
November 11, 2005 at 8:01 am
Thanks for the help - that's exactly what I needed!
Have a great weekend.
Carter
But boss, why must the urgent always take precedence over the important?
March 11, 2005 at 7:49 am
Ditto - when I tried with table aliases, I get
Server: Msg 170, Level 15, State 1, Line 1
Line 1: Incorrect syntax near 'middle'.
as I'm sure all the rest did as...
But boss, why must the urgent always take precedence over the important?
October 21, 2004 at 8:19 am
1 - They're fun;
2 - They'll look great on a resume!
But boss, why must the urgent always take precedence over the important?
June 8, 2004 at 7:48 am
Hope this helps!
I ran into a similar problem when porting sprocs and udfs. I was using the Copy SQL Server Objects Task in DTS to send tables, views, sprocs, etc...
But boss, why must the urgent always take precedence over the important?
April 30, 2004 at 7:43 am
Viewing 12 posts - 31 through 43 (of 43 total)