Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 122 total)

  • RE: slow performance

    What does parameter sniffing mean .?

    Could it really turn performance way down and your method is preventing the performance fall back.?

    Then should not every stored procedure be written that way.?

    I...

  • RE: Using: CASE, ISNULL(), NULLIF(), COALESCE()

    Hi Chris,

    Tnx, This is what i was looking for,

    Strange but i had been trying that in my experiments and got the error on the "<"

    As i try your code...

  • RE: Using: CASE, ISNULL(), NULLIF(), COALESCE()

    Hi Vic,

    Was been thinking on that also as solution,

    but as i have to get this for multiple variables it does make the code messy

    and therefore i was trying whether...

  • RE: Using SQL Server to talk to Progress

    jgrubb (1/30/2009)


    I'm a little rusty on progress. Couldn't remember the system user name. It's a quirky DB, and you can get bit by a bunch of things....

  • RE: Using SQL Server to talk to Progress

    is the security is the failure,

    Then make sure you create a user called "sysprogress" in de prodb

    any other user will fail if this one does not exists,

    Wkr,

    Eddy

  • RE: How to populate 1 row multi field from 3 rows single field

    Hi ChrisM,

    Tnx a lot for your assistance,

    It works not only like a charm, It gives me the results that i wanted so thats verry nice, but it also execute faster...

  • RE: How to populate 1 row multi field from 3 rows single field

    Hi Jef,

    In fact it is really simple,

    I select a lot of columns from different tables (lets say 10)

    I know for sure that i will get 3 rows back for each...

  • RE: How to populate 1 row multi field from 3 rows single field

    Hi Jef,

    Well what i mean is that when i'm off starting to include more "columns" (edited from rows) its more likely that those rows wont be unique (distinct) anymore...

  • RE: How to populate 1 row multi field from 3 rows single field

    Hi chrism,

    Tnx this seems to work for the example,

    Now i going to try to implement this with an update statement

    my original temptable has this structure and i foresee some...

  • RE: Bypassing the keyword DISTINCT

    Hi Eddy, this is a really useful exercise you've come up with here. Looking at this problem from a row-by-row point of view, it appears difficult. But SQL Server works...

  • RE: Bypassing the keyword DISTINCT

    GilaMonster (11/20/2008)


    Sorts are expensive operations and distinct requires a sort, as do most other methods of removing duplicates from a resuuklt set.

    The best 'workaround' is to find out why...

  • RE: Bypassing the keyword DISTINCT

    Garadin (11/20/2008)


    Can you make this join 1 to 1 ? b.BRL_ID = d.BRL_ID

    Where did you read that DISTINCT had a high cost associated with it?

    Hi, Garadin,

    Nope, that...

  • RE: Bypassing the keyword DISTINCT

    in my testtable

    i have 4 rows when run without the distinct and 3 rows if i use the distinct keyword

    what is exactly what it should return cause i have put...

  • RE: Bypassing the keyword DISTINCT

    That is idd whats the demand,

    DISTINCT works fine, don't understand me wrong, but cause i have been told its more expensive i'm looking for a more faster query method if...

  • RE: Query results formatting

    Hey Jeff,

    I was looking for the SP_MakeWebTask but the following appears on my screen.

    sp_makewebtask is retained for backward compatibility. New Web pages are more easily created using Microsoft SQL Server...

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 122 total)