Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 122 total)
What does parameter sniffing mean .?
Could it really turn performance way down and your method is preventing the performance fall back.?
Then should not every stored procedure be written that way.?
I...
February 6, 2009 at 10:02 am
Hi Chris,
Tnx, This is what i was looking for,
Strange but i had been trying that in my experiments and got the error on the "<"
As i try your code...
February 5, 2009 at 6:46 am
Hi Vic,
Was been thinking on that also as solution,
but as i have to get this for multiple variables it does make the code messy
and therefore i was trying whether...
February 5, 2009 at 6:11 am
jgrubb (1/30/2009)
January 30, 2009 at 11:36 am
is the security is the failure,
Then make sure you create a user called "sysprogress" in de prodb
any other user will fail if this one does not exists,
Wkr,
Eddy
January 30, 2009 at 2:53 am
Hi ChrisM,
Tnx a lot for your assistance,
It works not only like a charm, It gives me the results that i wanted so thats verry nice, but it also execute faster...
January 8, 2009 at 11:31 pm
Hi Jef,
In fact it is really simple,
I select a lot of columns from different tables (lets say 10)
I know for sure that i will get 3 rows back for each...
January 8, 2009 at 8:32 am
Hi Jef,
Well what i mean is that when i'm off starting to include more "columns" (edited from rows) its more likely that those rows wont be unique (distinct) anymore...
January 8, 2009 at 6:20 am
Hi chrism,
Tnx this seems to work for the example,
Now i going to try to implement this with an update statement
my original temptable has this structure and i foresee some...
January 8, 2009 at 5:49 am
Hi Eddy, this is a really useful exercise you've come up with here. Looking at this problem from a row-by-row point of view, it appears difficult. But SQL Server works...
November 21, 2008 at 11:03 am
GilaMonster (11/20/2008)
The best 'workaround' is to find out why...
November 21, 2008 at 12:00 am
Garadin (11/20/2008)
Can you make this join 1 to 1 ? b.BRL_ID = d.BRL_IDWhere did you read that DISTINCT had a high cost associated with it?
Hi, Garadin,
Nope, that...
November 20, 2008 at 11:32 pm
in my testtable
i have 4 rows when run without the distinct and 3 rows if i use the distinct keyword
what is exactly what it should return cause i have put...
November 20, 2008 at 9:27 am
That is idd whats the demand,
DISTINCT works fine, don't understand me wrong, but cause i have been told its more expensive i'm looking for a more faster query method if...
November 20, 2008 at 8:11 am
Hey Jeff,
I was looking for the SP_MakeWebTask but the following appears on my screen.
sp_makewebtask is retained for backward compatibility. New Web pages are more easily created using Microsoft SQL Server...
November 17, 2008 at 6:03 am
Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 122 total)