Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 658 total)
jfogel (6/27/2012)
But that wasn't the point of the question.
I agree now I know the answer.
But it could have been - it was the point of the previous question in this...
June 27, 2012 at 9:17 am
tim.bearne (6/27/2012)
The fact that you can get an index made to support a completely different constraint is irrelevant.
No it's not. Just because it is created for one purpose doesn't mean...
June 27, 2012 at 7:35 am
vk-kirov (6/26/2012)
I can create an index by means of a unique constraint
That's exactly the basis on which I answered "None unless the rest of the statement creates one", which I...
June 27, 2012 at 2:14 am
ScottPletcher (6/25/2012)
2. A Table Variable can have primary keys and indexes defined
Baloney.
"Defined" is inherently an action, not a state.
You cannot "define an index" on a table variable in SQL Server.
Baloney...
June 26, 2012 at 2:08 am
I took a risk and made the correct assumptions, so guessed the right answer π
But strictly speaking, the answer should be "false, false".
A Temporary Table can have primary keys ...
A...
June 25, 2012 at 3:44 am
Got it right, seemed an easy guess π
But when I then did a bit of research, it appears that FOR ATTACH will also work if the database had a single...
June 21, 2012 at 3:02 am
Am I allowed to complain that I got an error because I have no such database as Adventureworks? π
I knew that repair_fast no longer worked, but guessed wrong that it...
June 19, 2012 at 2:14 am
Presumably the 21% who answered "0" didn't read the discussions following the previous question π
May 30, 2012 at 2:05 am
I can't believe that 21% have currently got it completely wrong, thinking that OR has precedence over AND! Hopefully they're just all misunderstanding what 'precedence' means π
May 24, 2012 at 3:52 am
Hugo Kornelis (5/23/2012)
If you want the application to be outside SQL Server, you should ... even control the transactions from the application.
That's what we do (MTS in our case). Has...
May 24, 2012 at 2:59 am
Hugo Kornelis (5/23/2012)
May 23, 2012 at 7:13 am
Good question, but not sure about the explanation, which talks about implied transactions even though this one is explicit . The issue surely is that statement failure doesn't cause an...
May 23, 2012 at 2:18 am
L' Eomot InversΓ© (5/22/2012)
The really scary thing is that more than 10% of people responding up to now got it wrong. They don't know what SQL's /...
May 23, 2012 at 1:53 am
Good question. I suspect there'd have been fewer correct answers if "1" was an option!
May 22, 2012 at 2:49 am
dpathak02 (5/15/2012)
May 15, 2012 at 9:19 am
Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 658 total)