Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 242 total)
Jeff Moden (8/12/2009)
August 13, 2009 at 4:17 pm
Tim Walker (8/13/2009)
Steve Jones - Editor (8/13/2009)
Perhaps more we'd ask authors to revise their article after the first week to address comments and then we'd pay them.
Practical steps that are...
August 13, 2009 at 3:59 pm
Steve Jones - Editor (8/13/2009)
Perhaps more we'd ask authors to revise their article after the first week to address comments and then we'd pay them.
Practical steps that are easy to...
August 13, 2009 at 8:06 am
Steve Jones - Editor (8/12/2009)
steve_melchert (8/12/2009)
August 12, 2009 at 4:55 pm
Thanks for you comments Jeff. I'm clear that you're robust in this area of personal responsibility for writings 😎 (you probably don't like these emoticons either but heh...)
Jeff Moden (8/12/2009)
August 12, 2009 at 4:19 pm
rja.carnegie (8/12/2009)
Don't trouble on my account for "Ashton-Tate/Microsoft SQL Server" v1.0 or "Compact Edition". 😉
Ashton-Tate (!) - Did you type this into the site directly or use DisplayWrite on...
August 12, 2009 at 10:11 am
Steve Jones - Editor (8/12/2009)
August 12, 2009 at 10:05 am
Jeff Moden (8/12/2009)
Tim Walker (8/12/2009)
...was submitted in good faith and after some effort to write it...
I didn't see much of either in that article. I can understand why people...
August 12, 2009 at 7:18 am
As I mentioned in the previous thread I think the key point is to be clear what the status of any given article is in broad terms - opinion, editorial,...
August 12, 2009 at 2:02 am
Consider this as print media with a circulation in excess of 1,000,000.
I don't think anybody who might wish to do so would just be allowed write a front page article...
August 10, 2009 at 5:38 pm
steve_melchert (8/10/2009)
August 10, 2009 at 5:07 pm
Lynn Pettis (8/10/2009)
oli (8/10/2009)
Paul White (8/10/2009)
Gail's first post expresses it best, and in milder language terms than I might have used. I would...
August 10, 2009 at 9:44 am
I thought this article by Alok Dwivedi gave a good explaination of how long schema changes are likely to take to action on big tables:
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Design+and+Theory/67553/
Tim
August 6, 2009 at 5:54 am
You've clearly got some political isues to consider there...
The point the other posters and I were all trying to make are:
(1) Have confidence, you are right
(2) Don't land yourself in...
July 22, 2009 at 7:22 am
This is NOT a technical issue! Lowell gives you a way to identify this culpit.
A database is either LIVE (in which case it needs a resilient backup strategy) or not....
July 21, 2009 at 3:55 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 242 total)