Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 242 total)
Jeff Moden (8/12/2009)
.
August 13, 2009 at 4:17 pm
Tim Walker (8/13/2009)
Steve Jones - Editor (8/13/2009)
Perhaps more we'd ask authors to revise their article after the first week to address comments and then we'd pay them.
Practical steps that are...
.
August 13, 2009 at 3:59 pm
Steve Jones - Editor (8/13/2009)
Perhaps more we'd ask authors to revise their article after the first week to address comments and then we'd pay them.
Practical steps that are easy to...
.
August 13, 2009 at 8:06 am
Steve Jones - Editor (8/12/2009)
steve_melchert (8/12/2009)
.
August 12, 2009 at 4:55 pm
Thanks for you comments Jeff. I'm clear that you're robust in this area of personal responsibility for writings 😎 (you probably don't like these emoticons either but heh...)
Jeff Moden (8/12/2009)
.
August 12, 2009 at 4:19 pm
rja.carnegie (8/12/2009)
Don't trouble on my account for "Ashton-Tate/Microsoft SQL Server" v1.0 or "Compact Edition". 😉
Ashton-Tate (!) - Did you type this into the site directly or use DisplayWrite on...
.
August 12, 2009 at 10:11 am
Steve Jones - Editor (8/12/2009)
.
August 12, 2009 at 10:05 am
Jeff Moden (8/12/2009)
Tim Walker (8/12/2009)
...was submitted in good faith and after some effort to write it...
I didn't see much of either in that article. I can understand why people...
.
August 12, 2009 at 7:18 am
As I mentioned in the previous thread I think the key point is to be clear what the status of any given article is in broad terms - opinion, editorial,...
.
August 12, 2009 at 2:02 am
Consider this as print media with a circulation in excess of 1,000,000.
I don't think anybody who might wish to do so would just be allowed write a front page article...
.
August 10, 2009 at 5:38 pm
steve_melchert (8/10/2009)
.
August 10, 2009 at 5:07 pm
Lynn Pettis (8/10/2009)
oli (8/10/2009)
Paul White (8/10/2009)
Gail's first post expresses it best, and in milder language terms than I might have used. I would...
.
August 10, 2009 at 9:44 am
I thought this article by Alok Dwivedi gave a good explaination of how long schema changes are likely to take to action on big tables:
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Design+and+Theory/67553/
Tim
.
August 6, 2009 at 5:54 am
You've clearly got some political isues to consider there...
The point the other posters and I were all trying to make are:
(1) Have confidence, you are right
(2) Don't land yourself in...
.
July 22, 2009 at 7:22 am
This is NOT a technical issue! Lowell gives you a way to identify this culpit.
A database is either LIVE (in which case it needs a resilient backup strategy) or not....
.
July 21, 2009 at 3:55 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 242 total)