Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 148 total)
Reasons for log file size increase? One would be that you are in the Full Recovery model, and the transaction log will grow without a log backup because the...
June 3, 2012 at 9:17 am
Robert Davis (6/2/2012)
Select value_in_use
from sys.configurations
where name = 'nested triggers';
Instead of triggers are executed before an after trigger, and if nesting is disabled, the insert from the instead...
June 2, 2012 at 9:47 pm
Here's another question for you. What security context is the 2nd trigger executing under? I'm guessing you do, but a check would be if you have permissions on...
June 2, 2012 at 8:04 pm
Hmmm...that is really odd. I'd dumb down the AFTER INSERT trigger to do something as simple as an INSERT into a tempdb table just to see if it is...
June 2, 2012 at 7:55 pm
Which statement completed?? Try SP:StmtCompleted. I can't seem to recreate your problem in my personal environment. Your code works for me.
I'm thinking it may actually be firing...
June 2, 2012 at 7:14 pm
Have you enabled TCP/IP for your SQLEXPRESS named instance? This can be done through the SQL Server Configuration Manager (Start -> Run -> sqlservermanager10.msc). By default, a SQL...
June 2, 2012 at 6:56 pm
Out of curiousity, in your production (not working environment), does your INSERT statement have col3 set with a value of either 73 or 199? If it doesn't, then you...
June 2, 2012 at 5:16 pm
Jeff Moden (6/2/2012)
Thomas Stringer (6/2/2012)
But sometimes it...
June 2, 2012 at 12:26 pm
Ok, I'm not saying it is going to outperform T-SQL 100% of the time. Making a broad generalization like that would be foolhardy.
But sometimes it may be more efficient...
June 2, 2012 at 11:34 am
opc.three (6/2/2012)
Thomas Stringer (6/2/2012)
June 2, 2012 at 7:13 am
SQLCLR is an excellent tool, and there are just some things that can't be accomplished with pure T-SQL. Mostly the Windows environment, and aspects outside of the instance. ...
June 2, 2012 at 6:31 am
A few options are linked servers, PowerShell (executing desired code across multiple servers), and CMS (Central Management Server). How often do you want to do this and what's the surrounding...
May 31, 2012 at 8:31 pm
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (5/30/2012)
May 30, 2012 at 8:16 pm
Shared locks are compatible with other shared locks, so you shouldn't be experiencing any blocking from your explained scenario. It is also worth noting that read committed transaction isolation level...
May 30, 2012 at 8:00 pm
No, you won't need to do this. It is typical practice, that if you have SQL Server that is running on a box that may have memory pressure and...
May 28, 2012 at 6:49 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 148 total)