Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 5,551 through 5,565 (of 5,841 total)

  • RE: SQL Server 2005 Locking up

    1) lock pages in memory has no effect unless using sql enterprise ed. Also it should absolutely be avoided on a box with only 1GB of ram.

    2) Speaking of...

  • RE: Need Suggestions on tuning the data model

    Madhura I strongly recommend either taking a class or hiring a professional to give your systems and apps a performance review - or both!

  • RE: database performain slow

    Siva, based on your post I will venture that you have little to now experience or training in tuning a sql server database system. Do yourself and your company...

  • RE: SQL Query tuning

    One of the most important things was not given: the distribution of the values in the various tables. That will help determine if/which indexing will help.

    Also, the optimizer...

  • RE: Performance required on > 4 million records

    dhay, you are correct that at some point you are simply hardware bound due to the amount of data you have to chew through with your queries. Having said...

  • RE: sp_executesql execution time

    Fix the query, not the query calling mechanism. 🙂

    DECLARE @DUP_COUNT INT;

    DECLARE @QUERY_SQL NVARCHAR(4000);

    DECLARE @ParmDefinition nvarchar(500);

    SET @QUERY_SQL = N'SELECT @v_dup_count_out= COUNT(doc_id_pk) FROM '+ 'db_ors_aug24.dbo.opt_test_4' +

    N' WHERE '+ 'universalid' +...

  • RE: which index to use to limit rows in a big table?

    Forcing the index though gets you a horrible index seek/bookmark lookup plan in those cases when the status value being filtered is a large fraction of the 150K null values...

  • RE: which index to use to limit rows in a big table?

    You can add status to the NC index. The optimizer chooses a table scan because there are so many rows with NULL values for the SARG. I bet...

  • RE: Limit Resources to UGLY query

    Good proof that index maintenance really DOES have a price! I like the update mechanism you used too Jeff.

  • RE: SQL Server Benchmark Statistics Needed

    Heck, I have only had a few situations in the last 15 years where sql server needed to process over 100K trans per minute, and that was usually for limited...

  • RE: SQL Server Version Control

    I have heard from a number of sources that Team Edition for Database Pros is truly a 1.0 product.

  • RE: Limit Resources to UGLY query

    Really sounding like Analysis Services is the way to go here. It is REALLY good at preaggregating/precomputing and it does allow for updates to values too.

    Sometimes we really can't...

  • RE: Forced Parameterisation for tempdb

    Well, nothing for it but to give it a try then!! Test it out and see if it improves performance, keeps it the same, or worsens it. Drop...

  • RE: SQL Server Benchmark Statistics Needed

    1,231,433 transactions per minute steady state on an almost 2 year old submission to tpc.org. I will venture a guess that that is fast enough for just about any...

  • RE: SQL Server Version Control

    ApexSQL has VERY slick source code control functionality and allows the use of a number of code storage back ends.

Viewing 15 posts - 5,551 through 5,565 (of 5,841 total)