Viewing 15 posts - 4,561 through 4,575 (of 5,843 total)
True, but I have changed only one thing: a unique index to a nonunique index. Now call me old fashioned, but I believe that there should be either no difference...
September 8, 2009 at 7:50 am
Jeff Moden (9/7/2009)
September 7, 2009 at 9:18 pm
1) did you check to make sure that no agent jobs were running, like backups, checkdb, index maint, etc?
2) what else was happening on the server? on the IO...
September 7, 2009 at 3:15 pm
to the OP: if you DO test your system out on SQL 2008 with HierarchyIDs, please post back (or even better write an article) about the experience, performance, etc....
September 7, 2009 at 3:10 pm
I am also running a load through DTA as I believe there to be a bunch of missing indexes.
do NOT just accept what the DTA gives you and move on....
September 7, 2009 at 3:05 pm
>>There has to be a better way.
not sure why you think that. Actually there is a better way - a knowledgeable and experienced tuner doing his/her job. The...
September 7, 2009 at 3:03 pm
I second the priority boost comment. I also note max memory is defaulted - not best practice, but likely not a culprit here.
September 5, 2009 at 11:40 am
>>but change this one index and it all goes down the gurgler for no apparent reason.
Maybe it simply isn't apparent to you. You have changed the information and options...
September 4, 2009 at 8:14 pm
SQLRocker (9/4/2009)
SSMS 2008 does a good job in displaying the row count next to the table itself.
DBArtisan has been doing this for about a decade now, but it is the...
September 4, 2009 at 3:25 pm
Paul White (9/4/2009)
I think Peter may be working his way through from post #1!:laugh:
edit: "ORDER BY 1" :sick:
HAH!! 😎
September 4, 2009 at 11:56 am
select count(*) from #mytemptable 😀
September 4, 2009 at 8:23 am
Per this document (which is the BIBLE for performance tuning) "SQL Server 2005 Waits and Queues SQL Server Best Practices Article", LCK_M_S means:
"Occurs when a task is waiting to acquire...
September 4, 2009 at 8:23 am
1) it doesn't have to be a bug if the optimizer for 2000 derives a suboptimal query plan for a complex query involving 15 tables in a mishmash of views....
September 4, 2009 at 8:18 am
Dave Ballantyne (9/1/2009)
john.imossi (9/1/2009)
This runs but it returns no data, I'm surprised it will run at all to be hoenst. When I used to create something similar to this...
September 4, 2009 at 8:11 am
Try dynamic sql in the sproc. That will get you hard-coded values for every execution just like if you ran it in SSMS window with explicit values. You...
September 4, 2009 at 8:09 am
Viewing 15 posts - 4,561 through 4,575 (of 5,843 total)