Viewing 15 posts - 4,411 through 4,425 (of 5,841 total)
Guess we will have to agree to disagree on this one. In my world, 93.7% of the developers will take the easiest way to slap code together as quick...
November 14, 2009 at 10:10 am
Consider it job security! That view (especially these days) makes all kinds of things seem more acceptable!
Hope the refactor really smokes the original version!
November 13, 2009 at 1:06 pm
shannonjk (11/13/2009)
That solution crossed my mind a few times, the problem is I would have to rewrite the query I have which is over 200...
November 13, 2009 at 12:40 pm
The 'best' way to get the optimal plan for most everything covered in this thread is dynamic sql. Yep, you pay a small price for this in compilations and...
November 13, 2009 at 7:26 am
Please note my email address for future reference if you intend to have any scale to systems you develop with ANY ORM. You WILL be needing my performance...
November 13, 2009 at 7:19 am
Read, and REALLY understand, this and the 2 subsequent blog posts. They constitute the Bible of Deadlock Troubleshooting: http://blogs.msdn.com/bartd/archive/2006/09/09/Deadlock-Troubleshooting_2C00_-Part-1.aspx
November 13, 2009 at 7:17 am
sajid.mohd (11/12/2009)
TheSQLGuru (11/12/2009)
November 13, 2009 at 7:10 am
Not sure I follow exactly, but this query is much more efficient from a read perspective, but it doesn't seem to give the same output as what you have. ...
November 12, 2009 at 6:19 pm
CirquedeSQLeil (11/12/2009)
Just ran into a query here @ SSC that has 36 table joins - asking for tips to improve.
Can you give whomever is asking my contact information please? ...
November 12, 2009 at 6:06 pm
1) Buy more CPUs
2) Buy more RAM
3) Put TempDB on SSDs (or at least VERY fast IO subsystem), because it is getting CRUSHED by the sorting/grouping
4) do file IO stall...
November 12, 2009 at 8:03 am
How about simply stepping outside the box (litterally and figuratively) and simply prevent the loading of more than one file of data at a time?? VOILA!! No more...
November 12, 2009 at 8:00 am
there certainly are ways to answer aggregate queries without OVER, but they can be significantly LESS performant. As Lynn said, we need tables, data information, queries, and query plans...
November 12, 2009 at 7:57 am
Can you please describe EXACTLY what behavior you are observing (CPU, IO, paging, etc)? How exactly did you identify this command/spid as the one causing the problem? if...
November 12, 2009 at 7:55 am
Paul White (11/10/2009)
chk2009 (11/10/2009)
Thanks for your reply:-)How can we do that, can you pls explain me in detail, which command to use.
It's all documented in the link I provided before....
November 12, 2009 at 7:49 am
INNOCENT GUMBO
You will notice in my post about multiple clustered indexes, I put an upside-down smiley at the end. I meant my comment/question as tongue-in-cheek. 😛
November 12, 2009 at 7:40 am
Viewing 15 posts - 4,411 through 4,425 (of 5,841 total)