Viewing 15 posts - 3,961 through 3,975 (of 5,843 total)
Jeff Moden (7/2/2010)
TheSQLGuru (7/2/2010)
July 7, 2010 at 7:34 am
Back to the original question, it could be fastest to build your clustered index with SORT_IN_TEMPDB option, assuming you have a sizeable tempdb on a fast IO system.
July 7, 2010 at 7:30 am
Lots of things like ADOc, ORMs, autogenerate code, SSIS, etc gather information about recordsets and other metadata under the covers. I recommend you use various columns in sysprocesses or...
July 7, 2010 at 7:28 am
one thing no one asked is "what do you intend to do with this single-value once you get it"?? That is by far the most significant factor in what...
July 2, 2010 at 8:58 am
Third time this morning - but yet again we have a situation where a professional can help out TREMENDOUSLY. Refactoring cursors into set-based operations can be EXCEEDINGLY difficult for...
July 2, 2010 at 8:56 am
Once again we are moving into the world where a professional would be worth his/her weight in gold - or at least silver (metals are SOOOO inflated in price these...
July 2, 2010 at 8:53 am
Usually "I" am the one (or first one) to recommend hiring a professional to help with scenarios like this. But since several others have already done that I feel...
July 2, 2010 at 8:50 am
I had to do a similar home-grown approach for a client of mine with many thousands of databases on a single server that we needed to get over to a...
July 2, 2010 at 7:29 am
1) check for blocking
2) statistics could well be old, leading to poor query plans on report server
3) get a professional in to do some performance analysis and tuning, and teach...
June 29, 2010 at 8:03 am
1) I too am confused about the actual 'question' here.
2) I don't think you want all those sp_executesqls. Probably just want a single concatenated string and use exec (@sql).
3)...
June 21, 2010 at 6:39 am
Myself and a number of other MVPs have been hitting Microsoft up to get them to make cursors perform much better on the platform, which would be a benefit to...
June 18, 2010 at 7:03 am
Perhaps a Plan Guide to force the query that you think is optimal? Note that this can lead to disasterous performance for some other input parameters though!
June 17, 2010 at 9:11 am
Maximum wait time is pretty useless as an IO performance metric. Much better is to use avg disk sec/read and avg disk sec/write for the appropriate physical volumes.
June 15, 2010 at 9:03 am
I would say to stop using the maintenance plans for maintenance activities. Use Ola Hallengren's stuff instead. Sooooo much better!
June 14, 2010 at 8:16 am
I would recommend getting a performance tuning professional to help you out. There is a wide variety of things that could be root causes here, and such a person...
June 12, 2010 at 9:27 am
Viewing 15 posts - 3,961 through 3,975 (of 5,843 total)