Viewing 15 posts - 2,386 through 2,400 (of 5,841 total)
opc.three (9/7/2013)
September 7, 2013 at 6:37 am
The only thing I can think of that might be a performance effect of this is having data be physically "far apart" on disks, leading to a few extra milliseconds...
September 6, 2013 at 9:40 pm
james marriot (9/6/2013)
September 6, 2013 at 9:38 pm
I personally STRONGLY recommend to my clients that they avoid in-place upgrades, ESPECIALLY on clusters and ESPECIALLY ESPECIALLY when skipping THREE versions. There's just sooo many ways and places...
September 6, 2013 at 10:15 am
Koen Verbeeck (9/6/2013)
TheSQLGuru (9/6/2013)
September 6, 2013 at 10:13 am
ghoshal.soumyadeb (9/5/2013)
By saying "You will get behavior of 2008 R2" are you including all the behaviors or just the IDENTITY property?
I'm not saying anything. That was just a quote...
September 6, 2013 at 6:16 am
Personally I would not use INTERSECT. It is a relatively new operator in SQL Server and thus could be exposed to some bugs and/or not have all the efficiency...
September 6, 2013 at 6:15 am
Actually, doesn't SSIS interrogate some amount of rows (configurable?) and have the ability to "suggest" data types for inputs when you are building out transforms?? I am pretty sure...
September 5, 2013 at 5:37 pm
Since you are on SQL 2012, I wonder if something in the new Data Quality Services stack can do what you need. No idea about that personally.
September 5, 2013 at 5:36 pm
I always recommend full install too. Upgrade-install doesn't give me a warm-and-fuzzy at all.
September 5, 2013 at 9:52 am
I doubt very much you will find any benchmarking or other documentation on this trace flag. It would seem to be a "mostly-unsupported/undocumented" TF. I doubt you have...
September 5, 2013 at 6:56 am
Hi Sandy! I see that you are new to SSC.com forums. Welcome! Please note that we try to not post to old items.
September 3, 2013 at 6:51 am
do NOT use a scalar UDF if it or the place you are using it does data access. Read my chapter in the SQL Server MVP Deep Dives 2...
September 2, 2013 at 11:29 am
GilaMonster (8/31/2013)
Google: tally table (or dates table maybe)
+100
What kills you the way you are doing it is log buffer flushes. Google them too if you are interested. Tally...
August 31, 2013 at 7:33 am
pietlinden (8/30/2013)
Did you read Paul White's articles on the subject?http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/APPLY/69953/
and
+100
August 31, 2013 at 7:31 am
Viewing 15 posts - 2,386 through 2,400 (of 5,841 total)