Viewing 15 posts - 3,076 through 3,090 (of 4,081 total)
This is a classic crosstab problem. You handle it by case expressions to test the value in the fields column to populate a column in the result...
April 14, 2009 at 1:07 pm
Jack is right. We need some sort of image to work from.
However, you will probably find examples similar to your problem if you search on "CONCATENATE",...
April 14, 2009 at 10:21 am
I have a lot of catching up to do! :w00t:
Just want to say how great it is to see so much hard discussion and comparison going on in...
April 14, 2009 at 10:04 am
Gus, I rewrote your function as an inline table valued function and it gets the job done in half the time of the ConcatMaxTest function, but still three times longer...
April 13, 2009 at 11:19 am
It's not a big deal, Steve. Folks have been referring to Flo as "she/her". I swapped a few cordial posts with Flo a couple...
April 13, 2009 at 8:46 am
VK... my observation is that there is a world of valuable information to be learned from the people who hang around SSC. I shamelessly take every opportunity to...
April 13, 2009 at 8:43 am
Thanks, Gail. I was sure about the ORDER BY, but not the clustered index. I couldn't find any of the threads where either was discussed.
April 13, 2009 at 7:57 am
Y'all quit picking on my man, Florian. 😉
April 13, 2009 at 7:48 am
Thanks, AL. 🙂
There is a lot of new (to me) stuff out there that is worth practicing with. I don't really "own" a technique...
April 13, 2009 at 7:44 am
While I never wired boards, Jeff, I did start out with 80 column cards and 7mb of disk and time to have lunch while the code compiled. ...
April 13, 2009 at 7:30 am
Sorry about raising the ORDER BY issue. I threw that in while looking at the tests and just had a brain-short not thinking about the functions themselves. ...
April 13, 2009 at 7:20 am
Flo: I'm not at my laptop right now, so I can't test your code. I'll do so at the earliest opportunity. Couple of...
April 12, 2009 at 6:48 pm
Jeff you shoulda been a lawyer :-D. Wasn't it you asking why people needed to do this on another thread? I'm in total agreement that passing summary...
April 12, 2009 at 11:25 am
Your first example confuses me a little. (Why 42d and not 42e? Typo?)
However, if you are only wanting to get one single row back for each...
April 11, 2009 at 8:45 pm
I'm afraid more information is required. Your MATCHSRNO in the output set obviously references other rows in the output set, but I am not seeing the correlation between...
April 11, 2009 at 7:08 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 3,076 through 3,090 (of 4,081 total)