Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 129 total)
Hi Rich,
This seems to scare some people but it works very nicely in my experience:
By setting stored procedures as being a "system object", you can create them in the master...
March 23, 2009 at 10:40 am
Interesting article, it would probably benefit from at least a passing mention of the built-in stored procedure sp_help, mentioning how the custom procedure is better or more appropriate for a...
March 23, 2009 at 2:00 am
Sorry, just another "Me too!":
I got this error for the first time today (in the windows System event log, slightly different message but found exactly the same in the...
March 19, 2009 at 11:07 am
Thanks Noel, that makes sense - I'm not sure it's very "cheap" because the clustered index gets rebuilt when it gets re-enabled (according to the BOL article), but still seems...
February 3, 2009 at 11:22 am
I agree, this is a very good question, but there's something I can't figure out or find in a quick search: Why would you ever want to disable a primary...
February 3, 2009 at 5:53 am
Amusingly, I spent over an hour on this today and found the same solution (creating an index on backupset.media_set_id). Only after sorting it out on all our servers did I...
December 17, 2008 at 5:42 am
My comment (not that I'm very possessive about it 🙂 ) - I guess there's some sort of bug in the forum around edits.
December 17, 2008 at 1:44 am
strange - my post above was reassigned to Andy Warren! 🙂
I guess there's a bug in the forums??
December 16, 2008 at 11:33 am
Hi slange,
I think you're confusing a couple of possibilities.
The query above reports employees who have no "subordinates" - there are no employees that have their employeeid in the reportsto field.
The...
November 18, 2008 at 9:02 am
Hmm, nice one, I've never seen that issue described.
That provides another reason why the following syntax is (in my opinion) preferable:
select *
from employees
left join employees as subordinates on...
November 18, 2008 at 4:53 am
A slightly easier way to explain might be the fully-written-out equivalents of the IN clauses.
I've taken the liberty of "paraphrasing" T-SQL Syntax a little here, as there is no way...
November 18, 2008 at 3:19 am
Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 129 total)