Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 156 total)
The quick answer is yes.
Google-Foo to the rescue.
Index Report:
http://www.sqlservergeeks.com/sql-server-engine-estimated-time-to-complete-online-index-operations/
Long Running Processes:
SQL Cant estimate an actual rebuild completion time so get current running time.
http://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/76375/check-progress-of-alter-index-reorganize-rebuild
Google-foo CHOP!
April 17, 2016 at 4:44 pm
Replication in 2008r2 is rock solid for me in my environment and we use it just for the purpose you are looking for, a read only copy for read only...
April 16, 2016 at 2:09 pm
My thought is t3.code4=1 is unique and therefore the count will never be more than the base table (t1) so I agree you can remove that left join for count...
April 15, 2016 at 1:58 pm
The ultimate solution would involve partitioning based on date, if your purging is date based, then all you would need to do is drop the partition to delete, much faster...
April 15, 2016 at 1:42 pm
Sometimes SPN content can go missing after doing these type of migrations. Check that your SPNs are set properly on the NEWSERVER for the OLDSERVER
April 15, 2016 at 11:48 am
I would advise using simple update scripts on your database objects before propagating them to production. Since your objects are simple text any scripting language/powershell can manipulate your t-sql...
April 11, 2016 at 8:16 am
Great article, didnt read any previous articles before (assuming you started at 1). It should be noted that with any production DB system, even one that seems simple, changing...
July 14, 2011 at 7:55 am
I would love to see what the partitioned table solution would look like.
November 10, 2010 at 5:44 am
The real answer here is that it doesn't really matter if a Tally table contains 10,000 rows or a million rows. It it's used properly and if it has the...
August 2, 2010 at 5:26 pm
Notice your taking 'Fisc' information and from the tally table determining the Y W D information. But what if your tally table was just Y W D information, since...
August 2, 2010 at 2:23 pm
That can happen on multi-processor systems that SQL is allowed to use.
January 27, 2009 at 9:14 am
I wish I had a true single processor system (no hyper threading or multiple cores) to have tested this on to see how it worked. Would I have thought...
January 27, 2009 at 7:10 am
Glad you found a solution, however you did NOT get a 'it cant be done' answer here in this 'forum'.
Greg R
February 8, 2008 at 2:35 pm
Actually,
You can run the SQL Server Agent as a specified domain user.
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms191543.aspx
Greg Russell
February 6, 2008 at 8:29 am
What about creating optimized views for her to query against?
Just a thought.
Greg
February 6, 2008 at 8:00 am
Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 156 total)