Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 571 through 585 (of 673 total)

  • RE: Nulls

    IMO - This is another 5 STAR question.

    It was simple, elegant, and without a typo in the code, question, or answers.

    It has sparked three pages of discussion and debate already...

  • RE: Nonclustered Indexes

    da-zero (12/7/2010)


    Furthermore, even if you did take in account included columns, no answer could have been correct.

    Considering that you can have up to 1023 (max columns in a table -1)...

  • RE: Nonclustered Indexes

    GilaMonster (12/7/2010)


    SanDroid (12/7/2010)


    Although what you say is correct, your wording also seems misleading.

    Why?

    He left out the word "key" in his question, you left the word "index" out of your rebuttle.

    😀

  • RE: Nonclustered Indexes

    GilaMonster (12/7/2010)


    Another phrasing problem with the question - the maximum size of an index is not 900 bytes. The maximum size of the key columns is 900 bytes. The index...

  • RE: Nonclustered Indexes

    WilliamD- (12/7/2010)


    Slightly misleading wording. It should read "how many columns can be used in a nonclustered index key".

    Not certain what you mean, the correct answer was clearly "16 key...

  • RE: LIKE and = Operators

    john.moreno (12/6/2010)


    SanDroid,

    That's it exactly. Setting ansi_padding immediately before the table is created results in repeatable results.

    I understand that. My experiance with this feature in the past has taught...

  • RE: LIKE and = Operators

    john.moreno (12/6/2010)


    bitbucket-25253 (12/6/2010)


    john.moreno

    hmm I tested repeatedly on both 5K and 8K before submitting the question .. always produced the identical answers on all servers...

    Are you sure you executed the first...

  • RE: LIKE and = Operators

    rfr.ferrari (12/6/2010)


    althout this is a deprecated feature, but this is very used!!! in BOL the default for newer versions will is ON and not OFF like is now!!!

    Do you mean...

  • RE: LIKE and = Operators

    rfr.ferrari (12/6/2010)


    this is a programming error!! this BUG!!!

    This has been the expected behavior of this "feature" for the last 15+ years in my world.

    Was usefull when data storage and query...

  • RE: LIKE and = Operators

    Nice question, actualy had to run the scripts to determine the difference the two inserts would have on the two selects.

    My favorite thing about it was the lack...

  • RE: LIKE and = Operators

    Hugo Kornelis (12/6/2010)


    2. The explanation does not mention how important it is to make ANSI_PADDING is enabled at the time the column is created. If it's not, the results are...

  • RE: Unique constraint on a nullable column

    SanjayAttray (12/2/2010)


    Create a calculated column that is based on the column that allows nulls, and then define a UNIQUE constraint on the calculated column.

    Sanjay, Some of the more creative minds...

  • RE: Unique constraint on a nullable column

    :cool:I am giong to get my point I lost back!;-)

    Am I being greedy?

  • RE: Unique constraint on a nullable column

    BowieRules! (12/2/2010)


    I am sorry for confusing you with insert option, I only included it here because I found it on another blog as a solution to the problem, which I...

  • RE: Unique constraint on a nullable column

    :cool:I am giong to get my point I lost back!;-)

Viewing 15 posts - 571 through 585 (of 673 total)