Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 361 total)
No worries. I think it was handled very well and have to admit I had a good laugh about it.
What a strange, strange... strange thing to do. :laugh:
Thanks...
Craig Outcalt
January 26, 2009 at 5:13 pm
Here's a link to the plagiarized version
enjoy.
Craig Outcalt
January 26, 2009 at 12:26 pm
They're probably disabling the indexes, then re-enabling and rebuilding them.
Not uncommon and a good way to go.
I'm guessing they are missing that one in their load script.
~BOT
Craig Outcalt
January 14, 2009 at 3:43 pm
Lee Sloan (1/13/2009)
We define our levels of service at an organizational level to ensure that everyone can clear the bar every time
Hmmm... that sounds suspiciously like we need to cover...
Craig Outcalt
January 14, 2009 at 3:38 pm
I don't think there would be much difference, as behind the scenes you essentially have a lock, logged page deallocation, and index build + logging in both cases.
Best way is...
Craig Outcalt
January 13, 2009 at 3:42 pm
The way I usually do things is to try to check return codes and handle the error at the procedure level...
I code all my stored procs to return specific codes...
Craig Outcalt
January 13, 2009 at 3:32 pm
george sibbald (1/12/2009)
SQLBOT (1/12/2009)
Andy Steinke (1/12/2009)
Craig Outcalt
January 12, 2009 at 8:48 am
Andy Steinke (1/12/2009)
Your organization needs to suppoort saying no; it's easy to say this from an ivory tower perspective but you have to have management and executive support.
This is very...
Craig Outcalt
January 12, 2009 at 7:36 am
Jonathan Kehayias (1/8/2009)
SQLBOT (1/8/2009)
Normally I go for a single host\instance for the performance. The reason we use virtualization is for vended applications that...
Craig Outcalt
January 11, 2009 at 11:59 am
Great idea, great Article. Keep 'em coming!
5 stars!!
~BOT
Craig Outcalt
January 11, 2009 at 11:38 am
I'm pretty sure this is a negative result of parallelism.
I think setting your server-level MAXDOP to 0 means that you're letting SQL Server manage it instead of specifying a value....
Craig Outcalt
January 9, 2009 at 3:53 pm
I've never heard that, so of course I googled around...
If you trust this SQL Server Magazine, this guy says only Developer's Ed. and EE support asynchronous.
http://www.sqlmag.com/Article/ArticleID/47129/sql_server_47129.html
We only have EE, so...
Craig Outcalt
January 9, 2009 at 2:26 pm
Oh yeah...
it took me a minute to find it. But I like where it is in 2008 better.
I don't like the fact that the lock information is missing, because...
Craig Outcalt
January 9, 2009 at 2:12 pm
Also, the fragmentation percent depends on the order with which the data is inserted related to the index order...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Index+fragmentation/64424/%5B/url%5D
so fill factor isn't always the answer!
~BOT
Craig Outcalt
January 9, 2009 at 12:59 pm
High sometimes means above your baseline.
sometimes it is a concrete number... sometimes (like this one) it's calculus.
for Fill factor, the level of index fragmentation and how quickly it gets fragmented...
Craig Outcalt
January 9, 2009 at 12:57 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 361 total)