Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 683 total)
Those examples will remove all spaces (obviously) - which might well be what you want (it's not clear to me).
The example below will remove duplicate spaces - just in case that was...
Ryan Randall
Solutions are easy. Understanding the problem, now, that's the hard part.
May 16, 2006 at 11:22 am
Note that if it genuinely is a column of type 'text' (as opposed to varchar), the left function will error. In that case, you can use cast instead.
Ryan Randall Solutions are easy. Understanding the problem, now, that's the hard part.
May 16, 2006 at 11:05 am
Hi Ramesh,
No worries.
'¬' is just a somewhat unusual keyboard character (it's on the key under 'Esc' on my keyboard). You can run this to select it...
select char(172)
I should've...
Ryan Randall
Solutions are easy. Understanding the problem, now, that's the hard part.
May 15, 2006 at 11:24 am
That's good to know, David. Thanks for the info. ![]()
Ryan Randall
Solutions are easy. Understanding the problem, now, that's the hard part.
May 15, 2006 at 10:37 am
See:
http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/mladenp/archive/2005/08/01/7421.aspx (no 5)
or
http://sqljunkies.com/WebLog/amachanic/archive/2004/11/10/5065.aspx
For your example...
--data
declare @ColorChart table (Colors varchar(10))
insert @ColorChart
select 'red'
union all select 'green'
union all select 'blue'
union all select 'purple'
union all select 'green'
Ryan Randall Solutions are easy. Understanding the problem, now, that's the hard part.
May 15, 2006 at 10:33 am
Hi all,
FYI - The 'IsReallyNumeric' function in this link does what the (useless) 'IsNumeric' function should! ![]()
http://aspfaq.com/show.asp?id=2390
Ryan Randall
Solutions are easy. Understanding the problem, now, that's the hard part.
May 15, 2006 at 10:02 am
Hi all,
Yet another way! ![]()
It deals with all the different types of test data I can think of...
--data
declare @t table...
Ryan Randall
Solutions are easy. Understanding the problem, now, that's the hard part.
May 15, 2006 at 9:51 am
Thanks lakusha. I'll have to wait till we get SQL 2005 to be able to work through this, but it makes interesting reading in the meantime! ![]()
Ryan Randall
Solutions are easy. Understanding the problem, now, that's the hard part.
May 15, 2006 at 6:10 am
Of course I'm interested!
Not that I have access to sql 2005 yet, but still, I am interested ![]()
Did the example I gave illustrate your...
Ryan Randall
Solutions are easy. Understanding the problem, now, that's the hard part.
May 11, 2006 at 12:47 pm
I don't know how you guys can work through these things without examples. I find it impossible
.
RGR - I don't get what you're...
Ryan Randall
Solutions are easy. Understanding the problem, now, that's the hard part.
May 11, 2006 at 11:51 am
Yep - I agree with all of that ![]()
Ryan Randall
Solutions are easy. Understanding the problem, now, that's the hard part.
May 11, 2006 at 11:39 am
I can't think why you think it looks like a big mess! ![]()
For a start there's nothing in the proc which tells anyone...
Ryan Randall
Solutions are easy. Understanding the problem, now, that's the hard part.
May 11, 2006 at 11:08 am
end-user - did you have an answer to Vladan's question? You need to decide which 1 of those 3 rows you want.
If you can tell us, then it's easy for...
Ryan Randall
Solutions are easy. Understanding the problem, now, that's the hard part.
May 11, 2006 at 9:29 am
+1 for John's suggestion.
Note that the clustered index isn't a guarantee that the data will be sorted, so you should still use an 'order by'. It should be much quicker...
Ryan Randall
Solutions are easy. Understanding the problem, now, that's the hard part.
May 10, 2006 at 9:53 am
Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 683 total)