Viewing 15 posts - 2,071 through 2,085 (of 2,862 total)
SQL Kiwi (2/13/2012)
Replying to the article: the horrible *= and =* syntax is finally dead in SQL Server 2012 (no 80 compatibility). . . .
Paul, what do you mean...
February 13, 2012 at 11:13 am
Hugo Kornelis (2/13/2012)
Toreador (2/13/2012)
On both this and Developer edition I get a warning for each statement
"Warning: Index...
February 13, 2012 at 10:03 am
Daniel Bowlin (2/13/2012)
Ray K (2/13/2012)
JAZZ Master (2/10/2012)
ache
WOTD head
heart
brain
Pinky
Blinky
three-eyed fish
Simpsons!
February 13, 2012 at 9:27 am
jcrawf02 (2/9/2012)
February 13, 2012 at 9:24 am
CELKO (2/11/2012)
LAG ::= ROWS BETWEEN...
February 11, 2012 at 9:34 pm
Wow!
Tom, you have my standing invitation to the whisk[e]y bar in Bellevue, whenever you happen to be in this neck of the woods, but I will have to up that.
I...
February 11, 2012 at 9:19 pm
I am afraid you are asking a wrong forum.
February 10, 2012 at 11:06 pm
Addendum:
Even when the original question was framed for London (England, I suppose, as opposed to Connecticut or Ontario), I think that the numbers hold. DBAs can travel and their...
February 10, 2012 at 10:53 pm
It depends on the regional economy. I can speak only for the West Cost of the US where I live.
Specifically, in the Redmond sphere of influence:
(1) $95k per year...
February 10, 2012 at 10:36 pm
BREAK
Is this worth of logging a documentation bug?
If it is, please help me with the wording and I will make sure it will get triaged.
Thanks.
February 10, 2012 at 10:27 pm
GilaMonster (2/10/2012)
Tuesday morning: 2 hour 'strategy' meeting with developers (actually a glorified progress and task allocation meeting)
Thursday afternoon: 4 hour departmental progress meeting (including dev team)
Yes,...
February 10, 2012 at 7:37 pm
Correct.
The best of luck with your project.
February 10, 2012 at 7:15 pm
My trick for having everybody on time and keeping meetings short: the first point on the agenda is assignment of unpleasant tasks. Who is not there gets them. That...
February 10, 2012 at 1:41 pm
(back)
The shown version will remain 2.0 - that is a .NET architecture issue; please consult
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb822049.aspx
You can use 3.5 once it is installed (with types).
February 10, 2012 at 11:05 am
Viewing 15 posts - 2,071 through 2,085 (of 2,862 total)