Viewing 15 posts - 1,606 through 1,620 (of 7,636 total)
meelan (9/4/2009)
1) What permission set is your assembly installed with?I used EXTERNAL permission in the project. VS 2008
You may need to use the UNSAFE permission set.
2) Why are you using...
September 5, 2009 at 5:34 pm
Questions:
1) What permission set is your assembly installed with?
2) Why are you using ODBC instead of ADO.NET?
3) Why can't you use a linked server for this?
September 4, 2009 at 9:21 pm
I wanted to answer your question about HierarchyID a little bit more completely.
HiearchyID appears to have a real upper limit of about 8000 levels (and a practical upper limit of...
September 4, 2009 at 8:02 am
GSquared (9/4/2009)
RBarryYoung (9/4/2009)
Jeff Moden (9/3/2009)
REVERSE? Nah... just wicked dyslexic this time of day. 😛Hmm, for some reason I always thought that that word was spelled "cixelsyd". 😛
Lysdexia is...
September 4, 2009 at 7:51 am
Jeff Moden (9/3/2009)
REVERSE? Nah... just wicked dyslexic this time of day. 😛
Hmm, for some reason I always thought that that word was spelled "cixelsyd". 😛
September 4, 2009 at 7:45 am
Fraggle (9/3/2009)
September 3, 2009 at 10:15 pm
Jeff Moden (9/3/2009)
....enots ot nrut t'nod I os rorrim a hguorht siht ta gnikool yllautca m'I ...denrawerof neeb d'I 😉
Uhm, OK, I'm going to try to counterspell Zantana here, (rattle...
September 3, 2009 at 7:19 pm
Fraggle (9/3/2009)
... I would venture another guess that a company like Amway easly has 33,000 levels...
Uh, no, that would be incorrect. I sincerely doubt that AmWay has even 200...
September 3, 2009 at 5:06 pm
A *much* more efficient data structure would be a "sibling-precedence" type of tree, wherein chains of single-child node levels are actually stored as siblings with some kind of precedence ordering,...
September 3, 2009 at 2:15 pm
Right. We've actually had this discussion before. I think that the whole structure and are wrong for this.
The "branching level" of a tree is the average...
September 3, 2009 at 2:11 pm
This is why I say that:
paulj_p4 (9/3/2009)
so...
September 3, 2009 at 1:18 pm
2) No, the possibilities are too divers. You need to clarify this by showing us what you are really dealing with. For instance: there are *extremely* few legitimate...
September 3, 2009 at 12:52 pm
1) Nope, not directly.
2) The answer is going to be "it depends", because it depends on your Heiarchies and how your CTE's are setup.
That said, my gut feel is that...
September 3, 2009 at 12:05 pm
PerfMon has a slew of stuff built-in for SQL Server 2005.
September 3, 2009 at 11:56 am
I don't think that is what he's asking. This appears to be a multi-tenant shared schema situation, wherein "CompanyID" is the Tenant ID. As such, I believe that...
September 3, 2009 at 11:52 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1,606 through 1,620 (of 7,636 total)