Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 209 total)
Well, yes, but consistenly high IO is going to lead to higher overall cache turnover (i.e. pages needed by other processes aren't going to stay in memory as long as...
July 20, 2006 at 7:38 am
They're LOGICAL reads and writes - you can't infer whether or not they're coming from disk or memory.
If the duration is also high, this is a good indicator that they're...
July 18, 2006 at 10:47 am
When you design a database, always think whether you might need an archive database or not.
If your database will store data for a long time, and if that data can...
July 17, 2006 at 7:46 am
Carl, this isn't uncommon with 3rd-party apps.
You need to ensure that the load program always runs from the same account, otherwise you are going to create multiple copies of...
July 17, 2006 at 4:41 am
If you're using SQL2000 SE, you can't use AWE and so cannot allocate more than 2Gb of memory.
Try this link:
July 14, 2006 at 9:14 am
Try using sp_MSforeachdb (be aware, it is undocumented).
More information here: http://www.transactsql.com/html/sp_MSforeachdb.html
July 14, 2006 at 9:02 am
Hmm. I see - I thought Juanita was actually trying to remove the time portion altogether, not just set it to 0.
July 14, 2006 at 8:54 am
I'd write this using dynamic SQL.
DECLARE @sql = nvarchar(4000)
SET @sql = 'Select * from test Where PERIOD = ''curr_mon'''
IF @CUSTOMER is not null
SET @sql...
July 14, 2006 at 8:51 am
At the risk of flogging a point to death here, but I do think it's of interest, I've adopted the "test" approach and come up with some results. See...
July 11, 2006 at 8:36 am
Can't argue with the "test, test, test" doctrine. I've put a request in to my line manager to attend the Reading seminar, too!
July 11, 2006 at 7:23 am
Colin - I'm intrigued about your comment on the subject of column order. Since the only SARG column is on CatID, if this wasn't the leading column in the...
July 11, 2006 at 6:07 am
That doesn't actually strip off the time portion though, or am I missing something?
July 11, 2006 at 6:02 am
Colin's right - a covered index would give the best performance here (although I think it should be on [CatID, ItemID, Name], since CatID is the column in the Search...
July 11, 2006 at 5:55 am
Gabriel,
David may well be right (I'm not too good on the various connection property differences between clients that might affecte performance either), but if you could post some sample code...
July 11, 2006 at 5:35 am
John,
I'm not sure that you're actually going to be able to achieve what you want with only 3Gb available.
The /3Gb parameter needs to be placed in the Windows boot.ini...
July 7, 2006 at 6:47 am
Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 209 total)