Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 272 total)
My first thought on this was triggers not handling multi row, but it is clear that there are two separate inserts here so I am starting to think probably not...
September 10, 2010 at 11:21 am
Very odd behaviour.
When you say as one batch I assume you are highlighting both insert statements and submitting that way.
Can you put a GO between them and then run the...
September 10, 2010 at 10:02 am
The exact code you are running would certainly help. Also have you checked for any triggers on the table - if you are inserting multiple rows in one statement and...
September 10, 2010 at 5:29 am
Can you confirm the data type of the column startTime please? - Best to post th eentire crate table statement.
Also is the asp page connected to the same database -...
September 10, 2010 at 3:09 am
There is a possibility of a lot of discussion being prompted here, but in my view (as in Philipps above) there is no good reason to use an "id" column...
August 27, 2010 at 2:54 pm
You have run in to what may seem odd, but is correct (and I believe documented) behaviour.
The problem can be seen in any subquery when the inner query refers to...
August 17, 2010 at 11:14 am
What you ar easking is way too broad a question for a simple answer on a forum I am afraid.
What i would suggest to get you started:
Read all the...
July 21, 2010 at 1:27 am
Very true - I was thinking a less severe (and unlikely!) such as an index page simply not having an entry for the row in the data page or something...
July 7, 2010 at 9:57 am
If the collations match and the data is really the same then I would start to suspect a corruption somewhere, so details of all indexes and the execution plan to...
July 7, 2010 at 9:42 am
Have you checked both installations are running with the same collation? This looks like it could be something like a case sensitive collation on one and a case insensitive on...
July 7, 2010 at 9:34 am
I think you will find this is simply down to the speed of moving the data from the server to Management Studio. If running locally you have probably connected using...
February 16, 2010 at 9:30 am
The result will be ABCD (ie four rows with an implicit distinct from the union, or you could use union all if you do not want the implied distinct.
Not sure...
January 6, 2010 at 9:58 am
My bet would be one (or more) of the variables is NULL, and any operation that concatenates NULL with another value will return a null, hence the entire expression is...
November 19, 2009 at 1:46 am
No, SQL Server has a fixed 8k page size.
Why did you want to alter it?
Mike John
October 22, 2009 at 4:57 am
Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 272 total)