Viewing 15 posts - 781 through 795 (of 938 total)
Thanks for once again dropping some inside knowledge on us Keith For those of us who get a headache from 3-valued logic, just try...
February 27, 2006 at 2:37 pm
On a not so philosophical nature; if you want to search for unknow values you should consider using "NOT IN" in your WHERE clause or a <> join.
Both of which,...
February 27, 2006 at 2:29 pm
You're right, an invalid key throws an exception in the code. Because it's running in the same process space, it requires a server re-start. I left out extra exception handling...
February 27, 2006 at 2:26 pm
Hi Tom, thanks for the comments.
The main method I can think of for testing of UNKNOWNs is to perform three comparisons in SQL-92:
IF x = y THEN -- perform if...
February 27, 2006 at 9:50 am
NULL is not a value, it is a special mark (or flag) indicating the absence of a value. Not sure about the second part of your question - in many...
February 25, 2006 at 9:40 pm
These are symmetric encryption algorithms, so you have to use the same key to decrypt that you used to encrypt.
February 24, 2006 at 6:57 pm
You might not like the guy, but you gotta admit that he's always good for a confusing quote I was going to...
February 24, 2006 at 9:29 am
Excellent points and thanks for the direct link to Pascal's paper.
As was mentioned before though, even if you properly normalize your data by placing data that might be deemed "inapplicable"...
February 24, 2006 at 9:12 am
Thanks for the comments Keith. It's good to have feedback from the folks who set the standards. I cited the SQL-92 standard specifically because the majority of ANSI-compliance...
February 24, 2006 at 9:11 am
There's a lengthy discussion above about this particular issue above - without rehashing too much, there are dozens of schemes to try to overcome this particular SQL limitation. Some...
February 24, 2006 at 9:05 am
Hi Jesper,
Thanks for the comments. That's an excellent point about the two columns not being equal despite both being NULL, and SET ANSI_NULLS being OFF. Also, appreciate the...
February 24, 2006 at 8:58 am
Thanks for the comments. The adequacy of NULLs has been a hotly debated topic since the beginning, even among the most seasoned veteran SQL Academics and DBAs, including the...
February 24, 2006 at 8:47 am
Yes, you mentioned that it's not a real Transact-SQL statement. I was expanding on what you said it "isn't" by explaining what it actually "is".
As JT noted above,...
February 21, 2006 at 9:36 am
You really should state up top - in BIG BOLD LETTERS - that this is just an advertisement for your company's product.
February 21, 2006 at 8:36 am
"GO" is not a real SQL statement. It's a batch termination indicator for Query Analyzer. You might want to point out that trying to use "GO" in...
February 21, 2006 at 7:24 am
Viewing 15 posts - 781 through 795 (of 938 total)