Viewing 15 posts - 1,051 through 1,065 (of 2,612 total)
The only semi-good use of it I have ever seen was in a table that was for user-defined fields. The table included a "field type" and the data allowing...
July 8, 2008 at 11:09 am
I would start by ignoring the disconnect issue for now.
You should set up a new maintenance process. It should not include rebooting the server or doing anything with the...
July 8, 2008 at 8:00 am
I'm low on ideas here.
I would try to copy the data into Excel and switch the connection manager out. Possibly try an ODBC driver for text files or the...
July 8, 2008 at 6:16 am
Do you have a specific reason you cannot simply select the count?
July 8, 2008 at 5:58 am
You care correct - you cannot use log shipping. Replication works fine though.
There is nothing really special to set up. Configure your publication on the SQL 2005 server...
July 8, 2008 at 5:54 am
A lot of it can depend on what technology you have on-hand and what type of data transfer you are doing.
For example, if you are transferring data from one SQL...
July 8, 2008 at 5:45 am
I have tested Diskeeper and found that it could leave corruption in tables with BLOB fields on large, heavy-transaction databases.
I was working on a document management system and it would...
July 7, 2008 at 12:20 pm
What I meant was that writing great code is sometimes not a profitable endeavor. Everything has to be balanced. Corporate IT often means you compromise making the assumption...
July 7, 2008 at 12:10 pm
Ok, so I went back and looked through your original post in some more detail also.
So if I am reading this correctly, when you run the package using the shell...
July 7, 2008 at 12:00 pm
You are probably trying to argue at too detailed a level.
Management at most companies care about money and time. Ignore the "right way" argument completely and try to deal...
July 7, 2008 at 10:55 am
I have not found any tools that don't cause problems on databases of significant size (10gb or more) that have activity during the process.
July 7, 2008 at 10:29 am
It is the replacement for xp_SendMail. It uses SMTP to send email rather than needing outlook and a MAPI profile.
It works pretty well - look it up in BOL.
July 7, 2008 at 8:36 am
I'll re-read this in a minute in more detail to try to help a bit more, but right away I can tell you that the RUNNABLE process you are seeing...
July 7, 2008 at 8:35 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1,051 through 1,065 (of 2,612 total)