Viewing 15 posts - 6,406 through 6,420 (of 6,486 total)
Check the MDAC versions on the two machines. It's the brains behind Access' data access.
September 4, 2007 at 8:55 am
Is it possible to pre-process the results of the grouped subqueries into separate tables?
Doing aggregate functions on derived tables (themselves having aggregate functions) is implicitly going to be very costly,...
September 4, 2007 at 8:52 am
Since you're deleting everything and "starting over", you might care to:
September 4, 2007 at 8:13 am
For what it's worth - not wanting DTS "because it would be called from .NET" isn't a good reason. DTS packages can easily be called from .NET, and with some...
August 31, 2007 at 11:26 am
well - you could always "split the difference", and split the work into two separate pieces (perhaps - don't know what exactly you're doing). Such as - get the ASP.NET...
August 31, 2007 at 11:09 am
Yikes. Have you considered switching from the linked servers to a OPENDATASOURCE or OPENROWSET syntax? It's functionally the same as building a throwaway, one-time linked server. That way - you can...
August 31, 2007 at 10:06 am
Careful now - that's a different TRUNCATE. the log files "truncate" <> TRUNCATE TABLE. That's a evil twin![]()
TRUNCATE TABLE <table1> is a T-SQL equivalent...
August 31, 2007 at 9:49 am
By the way - for better or for worse - Although I can see why you'd want to do this - having the whereclause be something getting passed in sets...
August 31, 2007 at 8:53 am
the issue is the @where clause
@whereclause='tbldogs.dogcode=''LAB'''
August 30, 2007 at 4:19 pm
Also, if you can pull it off - drop any and all indexes you can during the delete process, then recreate them when you're done. things will run quite a...
August 30, 2007 at 1:31 pm
I didn't notice the simply mode. That being said - simple recovery is essentially a "self-truncating" process. It will log transactions for the length of time they are open/un-committed, and...
August 30, 2007 at 1:14 pm
There's something wrong with this story. Ever since I first read it - I've been calling their customer service continuously, and I still haven't received my letter yet. If you...
August 30, 2007 at 10:33 am
Assuming I understand what you're doing - have you considered doing away with using the function at all?
use something like
....
case when (@status like '%,'+s.value+'%') or (@status like s.value+',%') then...
August 30, 2007 at 10:06 am
Actually - you can often enough help yourself by getting your log files to a certain size, and backup and truncating the committed transactions, but NOT shrinking the files. Especially...
August 30, 2007 at 9:48 am
Viewing 15 posts - 6,406 through 6,420 (of 6,486 total)