Viewing 15 posts - 6,286 through 6,300 (of 6,486 total)
I knew this day would come...Jeff's avatar has become self aware and is now gobbling up all replies to his posts. soon it will...
September 19, 2007 at 4:29 pm
my numbers come in marginally slower with a computed column than a matching "real" column in "forward matching". Of course - I'm talking when BOTH columns are indexed.
meaning
Title like 'manager%' --title is...
September 19, 2007 at 3:37 pm
Well nothing obvious, or "low effort".
That being said if you do this kind of stuff enough to justify the change in structure- you could look at using a computed...
September 19, 2007 at 2:55 pm
That explains it - we have "EVIL TWINS" going on. Two different products with the same acronym.
The "old" version of the product called MSDE is what's called Microsoft SQL DESKTOP...
September 19, 2007 at 11:37 am
Well - I find this syntax confusing - so let's talk about it for a minute. Truncation in this case is the process of freeing up space in the physical...
September 19, 2007 at 10:56 am
Glad to be of help!
Reusing the accumulated values is a great idea. Aggregate operations are a performance drag, so not doing them multiple times over would be encouraged
September 19, 2007 at 10:34 am
Keep in mind - MSDE = SQL2000 versus SQLExpress = SQL 2005. There are also multiple "download points" for SQLExpress - you want to steer towards "SQLExpress with advanced services". ...
September 19, 2007 at 9:38 am
I was addressing your initial assessment that it was probably NOT a good idea to use a function (especially one that the OP wanted to return results) in a scenario...
September 19, 2007 at 8:51 am
not the same. If you throw the one in up top - you're essentially saying - if the TOTAL for cause HC is 0 then don't divide by 0. if...
September 19, 2007 at 7:24 am
Sounds to me like we got some categories with no data, or 0 in the benamt for all records.
Try putting this instead of the min(HcTot) -
Min(case when HCtot=0 then...
September 19, 2007 at 6:59 am
I'm not sure that those 3 are the ONLY requirements, which is why you're running into those struggles.
There's something about the nature of the operation needing to be able to be...
September 19, 2007 at 6:50 am
Here's why I don't think it's a fair test. By running it at a single size, with a single operation, and by using ONLY in an exclusionary way - I...
September 18, 2007 at 10:36 pm
I'm using deterministic, because when you create that as a SQL UDF - SQL considers the UDF non-deterministic. Try it and see.
SELECT
OBJECTPROPERTY(
September 18, 2007 at 3:21 pm
Agreed as to accessing the base tables directly. A function is overkill for this purpose.
And now - veering off-topic for a minute...
<off topic>
Michael - you only tested non-deterministic UDF's in your...
September 18, 2007 at 2:43 pm
<quote>
Just this morning, our e-mail server went down. Was that an outage? An inconvenience yes. People were still able to work, they just had to use a device called a...
September 18, 2007 at 2:08 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 6,286 through 6,300 (of 6,486 total)