Viewing 15 posts - 5,911 through 5,925 (of 6,486 total)
alter database <YourDatabaseName>
modify file(name='<YourDatabaseName>',size=<MinimumSizeWanted in MB>,filegrowth=<Growth in MB or num% for percent growth>)
October 29, 2007 at 12:22 pm
From what you've mentioned - it sounds like you would in fact need 1 server+30 CAL's. should be quite a bit cheaper than any of the processor licenses....
October 29, 2007 at 11:07 am
Antares686 (10/29/2007)
Matt Miller (10/29/2007)
October 29, 2007 at 10:55 am
you should be also skipping the quotes in the main select part, i.e.
SELECT SCHOOLID, [Elementary] As Elementary, [SBA] As SBA, [Secondary] As Secondary FROM
...
October 29, 2007 at 10:46 am
That must be because the value ce_individual_license_ext.ixl_expire_date_ext
is a DATETIME field. So - convert it to a varchar(50) so that you can get your error message in there.
i.e.
select
custid,
Case
when ce_individual_license_ext.ixl_expire_date_ext
is not...
October 29, 2007 at 10:20 am
Stephen - unless you override the ANSI NULLS setting (which is not recommended), any arithmetic comparison to NULL is false. so
a=NULL ---> FALSE
A<>NULL --->FALSE
A>NULL --->FALSE, etc....
Just about the...
October 29, 2007 at 10:05 am
If you're doing both installs as "default" instances - it's inferring from the name that you're asking it to upgrade. Meaning you can only have one default instance of...
October 29, 2007 at 9:54 am
It looks to me that it's stuck thinking it's an evaluation copy. It that's the case, this needs to be reinstalled/upgraded with a non-evaluation copy of the software.
October 29, 2007 at 9:50 am
..Which you can achieve by NOT specifying the reseed value.
In other words -
DBCC CHECKIDENT ('dbo.mytable', RESEED,1) --first, reset to 1
DBCC CHECKIDENT ('dbo.mytable', RESEED) --then, reset to max...
October 29, 2007 at 9:45 am
Greg Snidow (10/29/2007)
October 29, 2007 at 9:22 am
...except that you haven't defined an actual join criteria. This is a full CROSS join, or cartesian product as it's called. Every row of table1 is joined to...
October 29, 2007 at 8:59 am
For what it's worth - according to several MS case studies - the best performance during a big ETL load like that is achieved when all indexes EXCEPT the clustered...
October 29, 2007 at 8:53 am
Well - you could start with pointing out that they are running WAY under the recommended amounts (of RAM in particular) for 2003 + SQL 2000.
Just to "keep the lights...
October 29, 2007 at 8:29 am
Look to me that they're looking to extract 5 year's worth of info?
October 26, 2007 at 12:56 pm
Loner (10/26/2007)
October 26, 2007 at 12:48 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 5,911 through 5,925 (of 6,486 total)