Viewing 15 posts - 4,426 through 4,440 (of 6,486 total)
I was testing using the Alter...rebuild, since the DBCC REINDEX is falling out of favor these days.
That probably bears confirmation. Should be easy to verify with a small table/index.
February 29, 2008 at 8:18 am
Accessing VBA or VS automation for Office tools would give you the ability to cycle through the "tabledefs" collection in the Access file, or the table names as defined in...
February 29, 2008 at 8:12 am
Adam -
From testing I performed a while ago, issuing the rebuild with no specified fillfactor will rebuild using the latest specified Fillfactor.
Meaning - each time you specify a...
February 29, 2008 at 8:08 am
As long as the LUN's are PHYSICAL LUN's and not virtual/shared LUN's (meaning - based on different disks and controllers, not just a partitioned version of the same disk set),...
February 29, 2008 at 8:03 am
yusuf (2/28/2008)
Matt Miller (2/28/2008)
You can dump the one record into a table var, and read that.
I know I can dump the one record into a table. To do that I...
February 29, 2008 at 7:19 am
Try putting a ; at the end of the USE statement.
Meaning -
... Use [crime2]; ...
February 29, 2008 at 7:15 am
You should be able to locate this through profiler. You definitely need to get to the bottom of what's doing that. since it's an ongoing problem - I'm...
February 29, 2008 at 7:12 am
Brandie Tarvin (2/29/2008)
You actually have a separate DB to do the scrubbing?
Hmmm. I didn't think about that idea. Originally I was going to use staging tables in the...
February 29, 2008 at 7:04 am
February 29, 2008 at 6:45 am
The lack of communication kind of makes it sound like there's a 2-sided problem. The Server Administration should should in fact have the ability to back up just about...
February 29, 2008 at 6:43 am
then perhaps just try dropping and re-adding an identity column. All of the numbers will regenerate.
February 28, 2008 at 6:12 pm
Not at all - t'is true. I do okay - but there are lots here who can run circles around me day in and day out.
's okay...
February 28, 2008 at 6:07 pm
Not an issue - welcome to the boards!
Let us know if you get stuck. Lots of highly competent folks on here, much more so than I.
February 28, 2008 at 4:13 pm
Assuming your split function returns a table - I do believe so. Looks legit to me.
February 28, 2008 at 3:41 pm
Jack's solution will work well if there's no chance to have duplicate test records. If there's a possibility that a user have dupes tests, then perhaps adding DISTINCT will...
February 28, 2008 at 3:15 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 4,426 through 4,440 (of 6,486 total)