Viewing 15 posts - 4,201 through 4,215 (of 6,486 total)
I keep seeing the words "bookmark lookup" float by.
I'm thinking that's what's causing your first query to be slow. Since the name isn't included in the non-clustered index, a...
March 12, 2008 at 9:21 pm
glad that worked out for you. Thanks for the feedback!
March 12, 2008 at 6:52 pm
Was replication set on that DB? If so and it hasn't replicated, it will not "release" that space. It releases transactions that are committed AND replicated (if replication...
March 12, 2008 at 2:04 pm
I could give you the price we (when I was there) got as a not-for-profit, academic healthcare org as part of a multi-year Software Assurance contract, but that would just...
March 12, 2008 at 1:21 pm
If you're not going to get any cooperation from your IT shop, then I'm not quite sure what to tell you. You may be better off leaving them alone....
March 12, 2008 at 1:17 pm
Chirag (3/11/2008)
If you dont get the error message then its confirmation that the deletion worked properly.
Remember though - a deletion being successful does NOT mean it found something and deleted...
March 12, 2008 at 12:55 pm
I agree with Jsheldon. It's going to be painful, but you need to at least start transferring the tables, and progressively re-write the queries to leverage SQL's power.
There's a...
March 12, 2008 at 12:51 pm
I'm thinking you mean Active/Passive (since ony one of the node has access to SQL server at any given time), or do you have multiple instances?
Did you follow this procedure?
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms179530.aspx
Othwerwise...
March 12, 2008 at 12:40 pm
Look at using Select ... INTO
Example:
Select *
INTO MyNewTable
from MyOldTable
Uses whatever it derives from the query to make a table.
March 12, 2008 at 12:26 pm
You could turn it into a datetime value, and then format the output correctly. That would handle your display/conversion issue.
It would look something like:
select convert(char,dateadd(second,15794,0),108)
March 12, 2008 at 10:58 am
Just be sure that you only include "mother teresa-like" organizations, or unimpeachable ones. Anything controversial at all should NOT be included. A resume writer advised I drop things...
March 12, 2008 at 10:53 am
Mike Menser (3/12/2008)
Should create a staging table under the database where the original data is, or create a new database for migration, and then create the tables under that?
that's...
March 12, 2008 at 10:46 am
That's what is called "expanding a hierarchy". Microsoft has posted an example on how to do just that. It's here:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa172799(SQL.80).aspx
March 12, 2008 at 10:33 am
The order of the join isn't going to fix "missing" data. If tables 2 and 3 don't have data matching column a1 in Table1, then there will be rows...
March 12, 2008 at 10:30 am
No problem - we all have things to learn. I learn stuff every day, and I've been playing with various database formats for nearly 20 years now.
Whether importing using...
March 12, 2008 at 10:22 am
Viewing 15 posts - 4,201 through 4,215 (of 6,486 total)