Viewing 15 posts - 3,676 through 3,690 (of 6,486 total)
Steve Jones - Editor (4/11/2008)
April 11, 2008 at 8:47 am
Jim Russell (4/11/2008)
Understand, but are you suggesting that "," as a join operator is now discouraged?Thanks for taking your time to contribute!
Actually - it has for some time, since it...
April 11, 2008 at 8:33 am
What version are you on (meaning - patch level)? CLR was more or less a large memory leak on anything prior to SP2.
Also - you seem to be using...
April 11, 2008 at 8:10 am
GSquared (4/11/2008)
Matt Miller (4/11/2008)
rbarryyoung (4/11/2008)
Michael Earl (4/7/2008)
The semi-colon you have included is also a...
April 11, 2008 at 7:53 am
I'd think #2 might be faster, if the SP does the insert directly (no SSIS needed). The assumption would be that the flat file would be perfectly aligned with...
April 11, 2008 at 7:50 am
rbarryyoung (4/11/2008)
Michael Earl (4/7/2008)
The semi-colon you have included is also a batch separator but...
April 11, 2008 at 7:37 am
Nobody Real (4/7/2008)
April 11, 2008 at 7:32 am
Interestingly enough - 2005 gives you more options for doing grouped sums. You don't actually need to use the GROUP BY clause - you can use a SUM() OVER...
April 10, 2008 at 8:22 pm
WRACK (4/10/2008)
No I don't have any CLR functions and yes they all are scalar functions. None of them are database dependent.
e.g. I have a function called LCD which calculates...
April 10, 2008 at 6:30 pm
ROLLBACK is one of the possible "mates" to BEGIN TRANS. The other is COMMIT.
Given what you're talking about, it would simply be something like this:
BEGIN TRAN
Update my table
set etc....
simply...
April 10, 2008 at 5:02 pm
...
select field1,
case when [EmailAddress] is not null then 'QV' else 'PARK' end as Profile,
field2
from
... ...
April 10, 2008 at 12:59 pm
what kind of error do you get when you schedule that copy database script? I immediately assumed "security problem" (meaning, the user running the scheduled job doesn't have the...
April 10, 2008 at 12:41 pm
Michael Earl (4/10/2008)
Don't be too bound on the "Stored Procedures are the only way" approach.
They are not necessarily the fastest...
April 10, 2008 at 12:35 pm
You need to run the actual sub-query that you're using - it's not going to return the same as your query1. If you look - you will see that...
April 10, 2008 at 11:21 am
upendramkumar (4/10/2008)
Thanks for the heads up on the 'where' clause.
So when I delete the totalprom != 0.0, I get almost 2898 rows which once again looks like a cross...
April 10, 2008 at 11:13 am
Viewing 15 posts - 3,676 through 3,690 (of 6,486 total)