Viewing 15 posts - 3,061 through 3,075 (of 6,486 total)
rbarryyoung (6/2/2008)
My query already assumes that. It only excludes men who do not match every desire of a woman. Extra CHARs have no effect.
Save yourself some time....we ALL...
June 2, 2008 at 1:52 pm
Christian Buettner (6/2/2008)
Btw, congrats, Matt to your 4444th point 🙂
Thanks! but it's going to be 4445 once I post this:)
June 2, 2008 at 1:45 pm
There's actually two scenarios. If the view is indexed, then it essentially IS a table of sorts: the view is "materialized" as a worktable, and the results are then...
June 2, 2008 at 1:04 pm
Since you're using SQL Server 2005 - use the ROW_NUMBER() function.
With some assumptions as to your column and table names, it would look like:
select Row_Number() over (partition by memberID order...
June 2, 2008 at 12:49 pm
For what it's worth - using DISTINCT inside of a IN statement is just wasting cycles. You'll get the same results, and faster if you simply skip Distinct from...
June 2, 2008 at 12:37 pm
Francis Yee (6/2/2008)
I am telling you what I have done.
I have setup the ODBC which used a SQL user having the full dbowner rights. I could...
June 2, 2008 at 12:32 pm
Michael (6/2/2008)
For the sake of simplicity I used Jack's script which functionally does the same thing that I'm trying to do.
I substituted TABLOCK for TABLOCKX and still got;
Msg 308,...
June 2, 2008 at 11:51 am
michael.welcome (6/2/2008)
It looks like this is a least one of the issues. I also found that temp DB is on the C: drive and is probably sharing...
June 2, 2008 at 10:22 am
Tim -
go into design on one of the linked tables in Access, then find the table properties area. You may find that it's replicated the CONTENTS of the...
June 2, 2008 at 10:17 am
garyreeds (6/2/2008)
hi,i did not get the data after executing this script,only column names displaying?
I thought you were asking which columns where involved in this index? This would tell you...
June 2, 2008 at 10:10 am
John Mitchell (6/2/2008)
June 2, 2008 at 9:40 am
james (6/2/2008)
June 2, 2008 at 9:18 am
Wilfred van Dijk (6/2/2008)
Funny,According to Slave Oks (http://blogs.msdn.com/slavao/archive/2005/04/29/413425.aspx, very interesting article), he recommends enabling AWE.
And yet - per BOL - AWE exists but is completely ignored...Who's to be believed? ...
June 2, 2008 at 7:58 am
I can't say I know, but at the risk of sounding pedantic - if you have to ask the question, you should be considering a lookup table.....
May 31, 2008 at 1:09 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 3,061 through 3,075 (of 6,486 total)