Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 965 total)
BLADE (5/11/2009)
Oh i'm sorry.....it was just my mistake.............actually i meant about the users
No worries, it happens at times.
I like to use the script by Narayana Vyas Kondreddi to copy database...
May 11, 2009 at 11:16 am
SQL-KV (5/7/2009)
Iam facing issues on server memory utilization and many other.
If i check the activity monitor i can see many number of users (ex:80 user processes) in sleeping...
May 11, 2009 at 10:11 am
I wrote an article on using the Blocked Process Report on here last year that you might take a look at if you are on SQL 2005/2008.
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Blocking/64474/
It will capture blocking...
May 11, 2009 at 10:03 am
Microsoft provides some stored procedure to do this in a scripted operation that can be found on the following link:
http://code.msdn.microsoft.com/SQLExamples/Wiki/View.aspx?title=TransferLogins
a good primer on how to do this using SSIS is...
May 11, 2009 at 9:56 am
Bob Hovious (5/11/2009)
I agree, Roy.
You are an unbeliever, Johnathan?
Glad to see you're thinking ahead, Alvin.
Hey Lynn, do you think we'll make 5K this month?
P.S. ...
May 11, 2009 at 9:52 am
PaulB (5/11/2009)
Suresh B. (5/11/2009)
MDF and LDF files are on same physical disk. I think moving them (to different physical disks) may not improve the performance.
Your statement contradicts what Microsoft documentation,...
May 11, 2009 at 9:48 am
There is no doubt that separating your logs and data files is a best practice. However, if you want to know if you are having bottlenecking/performance issues from not...
May 11, 2009 at 9:40 am
I can't believe that this thread is still around and kicking.
May 11, 2009 at 9:29 am
I don't usually resurrect old threads like this, but I happened on this one while doing some other research, and thought I'd comment.
In SQL 2008, you can query the asynchronous_file...
May 8, 2009 at 12:36 pm
PaulB (5/7/2009)
Igor Makedon (5/7/2009)It looks like Pablo(3:20 PM) was mistaken with his "1." statement.
My fault, I'm sorry.
I was relying on my experience on previous SS versions; looks like SS2K5...
May 7, 2009 at 12:46 pm
I was somewhat taken aback by this as well. It certainly isn't how I would have expected this to work, especially since in SQL 2000 it worked the way...
May 7, 2009 at 12:22 pm
The login has to be the database owner, not just a member of the db_owner role, but the actual database owner for the database to show up in the object...
May 7, 2009 at 10:44 am
One thing I don't see listed here is that VIEW ANY DATABASE is granted to the public role by default when you install SQL Server, so you would have to...
May 7, 2009 at 9:27 am
mrlucmorin (5/5/2009)
The use case is quite simple.
When a row is inserted/updated/deleted to the OrderDetails table, if any of the row refers to an Item that is defined as a Kit,...
May 5, 2009 at 8:59 pm
If you can post your specific problem in detail here, I would bet that we can probably offer you some suggestions as to the best fit solution to your problem.
May 5, 2009 at 7:52 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 965 total)