Viewing 15 posts - 4,576 through 4,590 (of 7,191 total)
As far as I know, that isn't possible, since it would compromise the inherent security of Windows authentication by exposing the password. You could have a look in connectionstrings.com...
April 5, 2012 at 8:50 am
Those decimals at the ends of the rows don't convert into datetime values, I'm afraid. But seriously, I really think full-text indexing is the way to go on this....
April 5, 2012 at 6:57 am
That's closer, but we need the actual values in the insert statements. Do you see why? Somebody can just run your CREATE TABLE statements, then run your INSERT...
April 5, 2012 at 4:24 am
Andrew
I was being facetious - pointing out that it's always better to do your backups and restores through the command line than go through the fiddly GUI wizard. That...
April 5, 2012 at 4:20 am
No, INSERT statements. Many people won't bother to open a spreadsheet (may contain viruses), and of those that do, most won't have the time or inclination to import all...
April 5, 2012 at 4:07 am
Iain
Is it possible that SQL Server (or SQL Server Agent) wasn't running at the time the job was scheduled? Maybe somebody restarted the server, or perhaps if you have...
April 5, 2012 at 2:06 am
That makes sense. I usually find it takes about 25 minutes just to set up a restore through the GUI! That's why I always use a script.
John
April 5, 2012 at 1:21 am
Andrew
Do you still have the job history going back to when it was taking a long time? If you do, which job steps are showing the biggest improvement?
John
April 4, 2012 at 8:22 am
Then your package is not working properly, or maybe the e-mail that you don't get is filtered out by Mimesweeper or whatever you have on your mail system. Perhaps...
April 4, 2012 at 8:18 am
Rob
From those results, it looks as if step 2 runs every time the job runs - for the last five executions, certainly. What makes you think step 2 isn't...
April 4, 2012 at 7:56 am
Rob
Please run these two queries and post the results:
SELECT
s.step_id
,s.on_success_action
,s.on_success_step_id
,s.on_fail_action
,s.on_fail_step_id
FROM
msdb..sysjobs j
JOIN
msdb..sysjobsteps s
ON
j.job_id = s.job_id
WHERE
j.name = '<Job_Name>'
SELECT TOP (15)
h.step_id
,h.run_date
,h.run_time
,h.run_status
FROM
msdb..sysjobs j
JOIN
msdb..sysjobhistory h
ON
j.job_id = h.job_id
WHERE
j.name = '<Job_Name>'
ORDER BY
run_date DESC
,run_time DESC
John
April 4, 2012 at 7:33 am
Rob
Check that the first step not configured to "quit the job reporting success" when it succeeds. You need it to be configured to "go to the next step".
John
April 4, 2012 at 7:01 am
Yes, it's usually spelt lakh and is mainly used in India and surrounding countries.
John
April 4, 2012 at 5:28 am
600,000 rows in a report? I feel sorry for the person on whose desk that lands! I think some better options include optimising the query for the reports,...
April 4, 2012 at 5:18 am
I strongly recommend that you change the Timesheet_Date column to datetime if it is in your power to do so. This will save space in your database and, more...
April 4, 2012 at 5:12 am
Viewing 15 posts - 4,576 through 4,590 (of 7,191 total)