Viewing 15 posts - 3,556 through 3,570 (of 7,191 total)
Here are a few things I'd consider:
* Can you ping the target server from the computer the package is running on? If not, the server may be down or...
May 23, 2014 at 8:11 am
Think of it as rearranging the books on your shelf so that they're in alphabetical order. Because each book is now in a different place, that counts as a...
May 23, 2014 at 7:54 am
I'm sorry, but I still don't understand. Please will you post table DDL in the form of CREATE TABLE statements, sample data in the form of INSERT statements and...
May 22, 2014 at 9:50 am
I don't know enough about SSRS to know whether that's possible. But if it isn't, you could try using SSIS instead.
John
May 22, 2014 at 9:40 am
Just make the column a computed column as PK + 199? I suspect that your requirement is a little more complicated than that, but it's difficult if you keep...
May 22, 2014 at 9:38 am
ronan.healy (5/22/2014)
just 1 thing would that still work if say i had 10 different pieces of data in the second table that i wanted to...
May 22, 2014 at 9:16 am
You can set up a subscription that will e-mail the report as an Excel spreadsheet.
John
May 22, 2014 at 9:11 am
The only problem I've ever seen with that is if your job has a schedule. Your script will have a section something like this:
EXEC @ReturnCode = msdb.dbo.sp_add_jobschedule @job_id=@jobId, @name=N'Daily...
May 22, 2014 at 8:16 am
Something like this should work - a simple stored procedure with an @ErrorCount parameter. If @ErrorCount is 0, do nothing, otherwise raise an error that will cause the task...
May 22, 2014 at 7:12 am
You may be having intermittent network problems. Try setting up a continuous ping test and compare times of any dropped packets to the times you get the timeout errors.
John
May 21, 2014 at 9:39 am
Mark
I think your first problem is mathematical rather than programmatical. 400 values means 2^400 combinations, which is a much larger number than SQL Server can (as far as I...
May 21, 2014 at 5:54 am
Mark
Here's a couple of ways to limit the amount of processing you need to do:
(1) Work out the maximum rows you need to consider.
If you put all the rows in...
May 21, 2014 at 4:30 am
Nancy
Shrinking is fine as a one-off, so long as that table won't grow to 87GB again. If you think it will, leave the database as it is and ask...
May 15, 2014 at 8:54 am
I'm arriving in Telford at 8pm on the Wednesday, but leaving immediately after Thursday's proceedings have finished. Happy to share a couple of ales on my arrival if you're...
May 13, 2014 at 9:41 am
Viewing 15 posts - 3,556 through 3,570 (of 7,191 total)