Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 247 total)
Thanks guys for the replies.
I'm going to check out the link Craig! Thx
Table Value Parameters seem like a lot of work. I don't fully understand how a user is supposed...
January 8, 2013 at 3:55 pm
Thanks very much for all the replies. I greatly appreciate them.
January 4, 2013 at 7:23 am
Thanks! I'm going to save that article for reference. It is good to know that a lot of signs and symbols will evaluate to NUMERIC = TRUE including d and...
January 3, 2013 at 2:12 pm
i can increase the sample size if need be.
January 3, 2013 at 1:30 pm
Sorry I was having some trouble the resultset was too large and even the resultset specified above was over 1 million records and would not fit in an attachment.
I created...
January 3, 2013 at 12:30 pm
Well it helps to fix problems when you take out unnecessary COMMIT TRANSACTION!!!!!
Thanks guys! At least you started me to thinking.
February 24, 2012 at 2:01 pm
Thank you SO VERY MUCH! You are exactly right about the error message I'm getting. I fixed that one by replacing the = sign with the IN operator. But I'm...
February 24, 2012 at 10:30 am
Thanks. Now i don't remember having this problem in the past with SS 2005. Any comment? Did it change? I could test it but i believe i've played with 2005...
March 15, 2011 at 12:20 pm
I think i figured out the problem. I had to click on EDIT alongside the table giving me problems and change the datatype. It was usually the date datatype that...
July 1, 2010 at 10:00 am
Thanks that is what i want to know.
May 28, 2010 at 7:23 am
Chris, i need to run home for a minute. I will look at your solution ASAP!
Thanks for the effort!
May 7, 2010 at 10:22 am
Ok the conclusion I've come to is that I restricted too early on. If i had just allowed the cartesian product on the query and then looked at it and...
May 7, 2010 at 10:19 am
Thanks a million Ken! That's exactly what i want! I understand how you got them in the same record using AND R2.RowNum = R1.RowNum + 1 .
OK, i...
May 7, 2010 at 10:01 am
Hi Ken. Thanks very much. I'm still studying your query just to learn how i could do this differently (syntax wise). However, your query STARTS with INITAL enrollment then withdrawal....
May 7, 2010 at 9:29 am
For StudentID 577, if anyone is confused, There is an EnrollmentID of 559. It is an error. It got included by mistake and is not part of the data.
May 7, 2010 at 9:23 am
Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 247 total)