Viewing 15 posts - 1,111 through 1,125 (of 3,348 total)
BL0B_EATER (1/19/2016)
January 19, 2016 at 5:26 am
ffarouqi (1/18/2016)
I cannot post each, and everything due to certain reasons which I hope you understand. I'll provide you with the select query with the actual values replaced with dummy...
January 18, 2016 at 4:08 pm
ffarouqi (1/18/2016)
January 18, 2016 at 1:53 pm
Thanks for that, but you did not provide all the elements I asked for. Could you also provide INSERT statements with sample data, a sample DELETE statement to set off...
January 18, 2016 at 1:46 pm
There is no easy way to do this.
You could try querying the DMV sys.dm_all_sql_modules with a WHERE clause like WHERE definition LIKE '%SearchString%', and then use searchstrings that invoke serializable...
January 18, 2016 at 12:10 pm
By changing the condition from IN (some values) to = (one value), you caused SQL Server to choose a different execution plan.
By using a different execution plan, SQL Server attempts...
January 18, 2016 at 12:05 pm
Not sure if it is related or not, but perhaps this helps:
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/303774
(This is about @@SERVERNAME, not about @@REMSERVER - but have you tested @@SERVERNAME on both the local and the...
January 18, 2016 at 10:39 am
The code you posted appears to be incomplete.
The comments already indicate that @PP_IDParm is passed from the trigger, but you did not post the actual trigger code. The code you...
January 18, 2016 at 10:32 am
When using spinning disk, then ideally the transaction log should be on its own disk. If you have multiple heavy used databases, then ideally have a separate disk for each...
January 18, 2016 at 6:02 am
The correct but bad answer is to start with DECLARE CURSOR and OPEN CURSOR, plus initializing some string variables. Then you enter a loop that uses FETCH to get the...
January 18, 2016 at 5:55 am
The "problem" with wanting to ask too much in a single question (and I can know, I have the same problem when submitting questions) is that readers can get at...
January 18, 2016 at 2:26 am
With int, the maximum value supported by SQL Server is 2,147,483,647. Since you are currently at 1,000, I think you do not need to worry just yet.
If you do run...
January 16, 2016 at 6:51 am
I have had some very unpleasant experience with linked server queries recently. Unfortunately, I have not discovered any silver bullet.
When troubleshooting linked server performance, always study the execution plans in...
January 16, 2016 at 6:40 am
er.mayankshukla (1/15/2016)
When looking at low-level implementation details, yes.
Functionally, no. There are lots of functional differences between unique and nonunique indexes. So you will want to continue defining indexes are unique...
January 15, 2016 at 6:12 am
deroby (1/15/2016)
So, in a way this means there is no such a thing as a non-unique index then? =)
When looking at low-level implementation details, yes.
Functionally, no. There are lots of...
January 15, 2016 at 5:24 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1,111 through 1,125 (of 3,348 total)