Viewing 15 posts - 1,951 through 1,965 (of 3,348 total)
crmitchell (11/19/2012)
Hugo Kornelis (11/19/2012)
mbova407 (11/19/2012)
November 19, 2012 at 7:53 am
mbova407 (11/19/2012)
(...)
Like others said...
November 19, 2012 at 7:25 am
rmechaber (11/19/2012)
November 19, 2012 at 7:21 am
I'm not really happy with the question, and the explanation is just wrong.
When I saw the question, I knew it was going to be related to inaccuracy in the floating...
November 19, 2012 at 1:10 am
Neil Thomas (11/16/2012)
How does the explanation (all about @@error) relate to the question: "What is returned from #tblTrans when you run the below code:"...?
I'm not...
November 16, 2012 at 6:35 am
Roland Alexander STL (11/15/2012)
Use of DEFAULT keyword as default value.
Do not...
November 15, 2012 at 8:24 am
Roland Alexander STL (11/15/2012)
We ought to make note here that DEFAULT has been deprecated in an unspecified future version of SQL Server, so don't get too attached to it 🙂
I...
November 15, 2012 at 7:01 am
Dan Graveen (10/31/2012)
October 31, 2012 at 6:39 am
john.arnott (10/30/2012)
Raghavendra Mudugal (10/30/2012)
(...)
If the OVER (Order By UserID) was used then XRAY will get the 50.00 as he is on the 5 position and EASY in...
October 30, 2012 at 10:30 am
ben.norris (10/30/2012)
Aha, right you are, my mistake. Shame Hugo was too busy being condescending to make that point clear.
I am sorry to hear that you perceived my reply as...
October 30, 2012 at 8:59 am
ben.norris (10/30/2012)
It doesn't state that the field is nullable
First: It does. The CREATE TABLE script does not include a NOT NULL constraint, so the columns are all nullable.
Second: That is...
October 30, 2012 at 6:04 am
It's great to see a question about new SQL 2012 functionality. And the question itself is quite good - but it could have been better.
I saw two possible improvements beefore...
October 30, 2012 at 4:21 am
Good question, but the explanation is wrong. SQL Server always parses each query.
bitbucket-25253 (10/28/2012)
Therefore a single value in the WHERE... IN clause...
October 29, 2012 at 2:27 am
Definitely a good question.
I regularly use PARSENAME to access the elements of a dot-seperated string. And yet, I still always have to check the documentation to recall which part each...
October 27, 2012 at 5:07 am
venoym (10/24/2012)
I must ask, because this section of code gives the proper answer of 105. Why does casting to anything besides an INT (TinyInt, Int, BigInt, etc.) return 105?
I...
October 24, 2012 at 11:24 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1,951 through 1,965 (of 3,348 total)