Viewing 15 posts - 856 through 870 (of 1,162 total)
Well, the code you've posted is correct in terms of syntax, but it's fairly difficult for anyone to work out what's wrong without the full code (and DDL to create...
March 7, 2011 at 5:51 am
Well, I've never tried, but I assume that CLR UDF's have similar restrictions to T-SQL ones in that they're specifically not for this kind of purpose (e.g. data modification), so...
March 7, 2011 at 4:26 am
There are a number of possible solutions to this. Are you planning to do this as a batch process or as close to real-time as possible?
If it can be...
March 7, 2011 at 3:36 am
SQLkiwi (3/4/2011)
March 4, 2011 at 7:40 am
SQLkiwi (3/4/2011)
HowardW (3/4/2011)
It's important to note that none of these solutions will guarantee to delete the same rows as are being returned by the select statement...
Hi Howard,
I agree with your...
March 4, 2011 at 6:53 am
It's important to note that none of these solutions will guarantee to delete the same rows as are being returned by the select statement (nor indeed is the select statement...
March 4, 2011 at 3:55 am
March 3, 2011 at 7:06 am
I suspect the OP is aware of the nature of the data and isn't trying to translate from Korean into English 🙂
I'd suggest reading up about collation.
To put it simply,...
March 3, 2011 at 6:47 am
Koen Verbeeck (3/2/2011)
I would be a lot less uglier if the derived column wasn't a one-line-editor.
Don't be hard on yourself, I'm sure you're not that ugly 😛
Script component is definitely...
March 2, 2011 at 6:26 am
I'd recommend having a look here, which answers all of those questions:
http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/editions-compare.aspx
March 2, 2011 at 3:55 am
No, pretty much everything that happens within the scope of an individual database is part of the transaction and can be rolled back, including DDL and indeed TRUNCATE (another transaction...
March 1, 2011 at 6:13 am
GSquared (2/28/2011)
HowardW (2/28/2011)
GSquared (2/28/2011)
Yes. With Encryption is junk. A batch trace defeats it, if I remember correctly.
And it uses a very easily reversible algorithm - I think Red...
February 28, 2011 at 8:32 am
GSquared (2/28/2011)
Yes. With Encryption is junk. A batch trace defeats it, if I remember correctly.
And it uses a very easily reversible algorithm - I think Red Gate SQL...
February 28, 2011 at 7:09 am
So, to clarify, which version of SQL Server are you using?
February 28, 2011 at 6:35 am
Interesting...
That is written for 2000 (this is the 2008 forum) - what it's saying is that because the inserted and deleted tables need to include all columns, not just the...
February 28, 2011 at 6:26 am
Viewing 15 posts - 856 through 870 (of 1,162 total)