Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 1,162 total)
GilaMonster (11/9/2011)
HowardW (11/9/2011)
November 9, 2011 at 8:45 am
GSquared (11/9/2011)
November 9, 2011 at 8:27 am
A PK constraint is entirely enforced by it's index. They're intrinsically linked and cannot be seperated/changed without dropping the PK.
When the PK is Non-Clustered, this creates a Non-Clustered Unique...
November 1, 2011 at 8:16 am
jackimo (10/28/2011)
October 28, 2011 at 8:57 am
Krishnaraj9 (10/28/2011)
October 28, 2011 at 7:54 am
Well, technically speaking, I guess you can have more than one log file per database, although, I'm not sure if the combined size of these can be greater than 2TB...
October 28, 2011 at 7:42 am
Jeff Moden (10/24/2011)
HowardW (10/24/2011)
Just came across this:http://sqlserverboost.info/?p=204
Complete plagiarism, yes?[/url]
The rest of the site content looks equally dubious.
Google for the phrase "In my experience, every DBA has his own mental checklist"......
October 24, 2011 at 5:46 am
Just came across this:
http://sqlserverboost.info/?p=204
Complete plagiarism, yes?[/url]
The rest of the site content looks equally dubious.
October 24, 2011 at 3:21 am
Make sure you're meeting the conditions here in the first instance:
October 14, 2011 at 10:33 am
I don't think you can disable local DAC can you? If you're talking about remote DAC, then the work-around would be to RDP locally, establish connection to DAC locally, then...
October 14, 2011 at 10:25 am
Performace Guard (Shehap) (10/12/2011)
Howardw, This is as generic concept for between and < / > for all queries regardless that query specifically
Ok, so I'm still not understanding...
October 12, 2011 at 9:26 am
Performace Guard (Shehap) (10/12/2011)
therefore, you have to change your codes accordingly to...
October 12, 2011 at 9:15 am
You definitely can't use case statements like that (nor do you need to).
This is a classic example of a Catch-All query.
The logical way to convert what you're trying to do...
October 12, 2011 at 4:24 am
The theory of the post above is correct if you're using SQL 2008, but bear in mind that it's not functionally equivelent (add another row for "2011-10-03 00:00:00.000" to show...
October 12, 2011 at 2:29 am
In what way are the results different? What's the data type of the "DATA" column?
Is HFM_ENTITY a character column? If so, do you have a case sensitive collation in...
October 11, 2011 at 6:00 am
Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 1,162 total)