Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 462 total)
Also you dont have to reindex and update the statistics for all your tables daily.
You should check at the end of the days the fragmentation status of each of your...
Bye
Gabor
June 7, 2005 at 2:08 am
I agree with cmille.
Actually the performance gain of the 64 bit processor is for memory intensive applications (over 4 GB). The pure processor speed is not enormously higher then the...
Bye
Gabor
June 2, 2005 at 1:46 am
Just an answer to Rémi's comment:
SQLserver will still use the index if you have this kind of query:
declare @v-2 varchar(50)
set @v-2 = 'E'
select * from dbo.T_CUS_customer
where cus_code_char like @v-2 +...
Bye
Gabor
June 1, 2005 at 4:19 am
AFAIK SQLServer 64 bit edition is running exclusively on Itanium II
.
So if you are planning to use some cheaper CPU (As I would...
Bye
Gabor
June 1, 2005 at 3:54 am
Yes I can, (this was the first thing I've tried out when I've seen the problem) but not with the REPAIR_FAST option because it requires the database to be in...
Bye
Gabor
May 6, 2005 at 5:13 am
I do not really see any performance issues (AVG % disk time is less then 5%, AVG disk queue is a bit high (AVG 3-5) but not too dramatical). Also I...
Bye
Gabor
May 6, 2005 at 1:44 am
Also, how can I stop a checkpoint process?
Bye
Gabor
May 5, 2005 at 9:35 am
I can select from that table, but I cann't reindex neither that table nor the other tables in that database, and I cannot backup the database.
The problem with a restart is that...
Bye
Gabor
May 5, 2005 at 9:31 am
This is the entry of the error log (And of cours this entry repeats itself hundreds of time
2005-05-05 16:32:24.67 spid7 Time out occurred while waiting for buffer latch type...
Bye
Gabor
May 5, 2005 at 9:00 am
Just to have a different opinion in a 100% MS world ![]()
I'm using Delphi for the Windows development, because it is very fast in...
Bye
Gabor
May 2, 2005 at 2:25 am
I'm a very different opinion ![]()
I'm using for the Windows development Delphi which is reliably and fast in development and execution time, working extremly...
Bye
Gabor
May 2, 2005 at 2:22 am
And my 2 cents:
Don't forget: a char(n) is represented internally as an array of n bytes.
So to make a comparison SQLServer has to do a loop and compare every bytes...
Bye
Gabor
May 2, 2005 at 1:40 am
Shure!
You can check the access plan within your Query Analyzer.
So you can see whether it is using an index or a table scan
Bye
Gabor
April 14, 2005 at 7:31 am
Shure.
The rowcnt column is valid for the entire table.
For a query with a where clause only the count(*) can work
Bye
Gabor
April 14, 2005 at 3:23 am
Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 462 total)