Viewing 15 posts - 3,121 through 3,135 (of 5,356 total)
That's what I really hated when I was professionally developing.
Commonly you don't have the time to implement an efficient solution, but rather an effective one.
It's was one of the...
December 16, 2003 at 5:23 am
quote:
One issue is that we get relatively few responses to polls. Any ideas for improving the response rate? We considering making it...
December 16, 2003 at 5:16 am
I think DTS s*cks...but it would be an good option, I guess.
Maybe you should start this thread again in the DTS section.
Frank
December 16, 2003 at 4:53 am
Yes, it is!
That's why such things should be carefully planned.
Hey, after all, you don't do this every day, or? ![]()
Frank
December 16, 2003 at 4:48 am
something like
CREATE TABLE MyUniqueTable
(UniqueColumn UNIQUEIDENTIFIER DEFAULT NEWID(),
Characters ...
December 16, 2003 at 4:42 am
Don't mix up SQL and the relational model! That are two different pairs of shoes (can I say so?).
I think SQL Server does quite a good job on implementing SQL...
December 16, 2003 at 4:40 am
sorry, lost track yesterday evening....
You might also want to consider eliminating this varchar(1) thing on NAME_MI ![]()
Frank
December 16, 2003 at 3:09 am
The results would be the same. However, try to create a view without specifying TOP 100 PERCENT.
Frank
December 16, 2003 at 2:19 am
Is this a one-time action or do you need to do this on a regular basis?
I thought of utilizing something like this
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/scripts/contributions/225.asp
or that
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/scripts/contributions/592.asp
Frank
December 16, 2003 at 2:16 am
Apart from this lesser flaw (IMHO) try to run the given alternatives from QA. Only one should create the view.
Frank
December 16, 2003 at 1:44 am
Could you please start the thread again in a more appropriate forum category?
Frank
December 16, 2003 at 1:42 am
Mainly because the view is syntactically not correct.
You're referencing a column articleid in the ORDER BY that seem not to exist in the underlying table.
Frank
December 16, 2003 at 1:35 am
There are several scripts on this site that let you split a string into pieces. Because you have different delimiters I would look for a function where you specify which...
December 16, 2003 at 1:23 am
Jonathan,
the paper is about SQL7. I thought the query optimizer hase greatly improved between these versions. Is it still valid for SQL2k?
Frank
December 16, 2003 at 12:50 am
SELECT yourcolumns FROM yourtable WHERE yourdatecolumn BETWEEN GETDATE()-365 AND GETDATE()
If you must take care for leap years you should use DATEADD. Works also with negative numbers as interval.
Frank
December 15, 2003 at 2:22 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 3,121 through 3,135 (of 5,356 total)