Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 1,219 total)
Presumably because you still have an open transaction. Run SELECT @@trancount in the first window. Presumably you already had an open transaction when you issued the BEGIN TRANSACTION in your...
August 1, 2014 at 2:04 pm
Keep in mind that the EXECUTE AS clause specifies a database user. I assume that you are a member of sysadmin. In that case, your login maps to dbo in...
July 22, 2014 at 2:39 pm
This article on my web site includes examples for a related problem - having users to start a specific job,
http://www.sommarskog.se/grantperm.html. Maybe it can serve as inspiration?
July 21, 2014 at 2:59 pm
Having the application using only stored procedures certainly gives somewhat better security, since you don't have to grant direct access to the tables. And if all you want to keep...
July 10, 2014 at 2:28 pm
It's fully clear what your question really is, but there is no way you can lock out users from doing things only from the application and never be able to...
July 7, 2014 at 2:55 pm
Apparently, you have a transaction active in your application.
I seem to recall that I saw somewhere that MSOLAP does not support distributed transactions.
This should help
EXEC sp_serveroption LINKED_OLAP, 'remote proc transaction...
July 3, 2014 at 4:22 am
pharmkittie (7/1/2014)
I assume here...
July 1, 2014 at 1:42 pm
Neeraj Dwivedi (7/1/2014)
July 1, 2014 at 1:18 pm
Well, as they say in the trade, it depends.
If you have clients accessing SQL Server from a non-trusted domain, SQL logins is your only option. This includes the case you...
July 1, 2014 at 12:45 pm
pharmkittie (7/1/2014)
They wanted me to develop using Visual Studio on the server.
Now, that is completely crazy! Many Windows admins would say flat no to having a Visual Studio on a...
July 1, 2014 at 12:40 pm
Oh, the joys of company politics!
I certainly would not like to have a work computer where I don't have admin rights. But the only advice I can give is that...
July 1, 2014 at 2:03 am
They are not logins. They are schemas, and for legacy reasons they are also database users. dbo is dbo, the overall almighty in the database and you can't do anything...
June 30, 2014 at 1:00 pm
As long as you have db_owner permission in the database, you can do whatever you like. And if you are sysadmin on server level, you are db_owner on database level.
Exactly...
June 30, 2014 at 10:58 am
You should keep the login and the group as a user. But you should drop the group from db_datawriter and db_datareader.
Which version (including service pack) does this server have?
June 26, 2014 at 1:57 pm
For the main instance DB1 the user has permission through group wingroup1. On the second instance DB2 (which is called using the four-part notation) they had no permissions...
June 26, 2014 at 1:28 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 1,219 total)