Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 101 total)
Hi,
What's your goal with the Disaster Recovery Plan? Do you want to have a general one or a specific one for your environment?
There's no point to create a general one...
-- Erik http://blog.rollback.hu
September 10, 2007 at 9:58 am
Hi,
Just a quick question to avoid a pitfall: Do you use uncommitted read in your query? I yes, this error message can be quite normal (if not pointing to the...
-- Erik http://blog.rollback.hu
September 7, 2007 at 2:47 am
Jeremy,
The size of the transaction log (of the app db) won't grow faster because of replication.
One question: how are you going to implement the pull replication on SQL 2005...
-- Erik http://blog.rollback.hu
September 6, 2007 at 5:01 am
John,
Aren't you going to upgrade to SQL 2005?
There you can use peer-to-peer (bidirectional multimaster) replication which can give you the required result.
-- Erik http://blog.rollback.hu
September 6, 2007 at 2:04 am
Agree with Paul. You can use also log shipping for business continuity, with which you can quite easily bring your lost database up-to-date. Read this series: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2000/deploy/sqlhalp.mspx
-- Erik http://blog.rollback.hu
September 3, 2007 at 11:06 am
Hi Mike,
Microsoft is your friend, they've almost done it
Check http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/mirroringevents.mspx and download the word document. As you'll see, you can catch WMI...
-- Erik http://blog.rollback.hu
September 1, 2007 at 2:54 pm
Hi,
It looks like a disk bottleneck. Check it, and if it is, then try to lower the number of virtual devices in LiteSpeed (I don't know how they call it...
-- Erik http://blog.rollback.hu
September 1, 2007 at 2:33 pm
Hi Pavan,
Next time if it happens, find what causes the blocking, this way you may modify your script to avoid this situation. Here's a quite simple script for this task,...
-- Erik http://blog.rollback.hu
August 31, 2007 at 1:16 pm
Hi,
Check this:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms152572.aspx
This is for SQL 2005, but may help you.
-- Erik http://blog.rollback.hu
August 31, 2007 at 12:23 pm
SQL ORACLE,
You should be nicer to a new guy ![]()
Hank,
You can do this with transactional replication and with some trick ![]()
-- Erik http://blog.rollback.hu
August 31, 2007 at 11:34 am
Hi Simon,
There's no difference until you add more articles to your publications. So you can decide which one is the better for you. I would choose the 'all' instead of...
-- Erik http://blog.rollback.hu
August 31, 2007 at 11:15 am
Hi Mike,
1-Firewalls are a very good arguments for push replication. This case you need to open only one port: your SQL server for your customers. First, this way you risk...
-- Erik http://blog.rollback.hu
August 31, 2007 at 5:17 am
Sure, you can do it, but it won't take into effect until you restart your job if it's set to run continuously. In this case, you can easily stop and...
-- Erik http://blog.rollback.hu
August 29, 2007 at 7:18 am
Hi Mike,
If I were you, I'd set up continuous push replication. My reasons:
Continuous: If you set up a scheduled replication, then from time to time it starts up, hitting your...
-- Erik http://blog.rollback.hu
August 29, 2007 at 7:15 am
JP,
Here's the URL, it was posted to another forum (hopefully I won't be banned for this
).
http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=69430
If you can migrate to 2005, then you...
-- Erik http://blog.rollback.hu
August 17, 2007 at 1:44 am
Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 101 total)